Missouri's gerrymandered map goes on trial this week. Here’s where the many cases stand83%

By Steve Kraske0% Halle Jackson0%

2/9/2026, 10:35:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 386 faulty-reasoning hits from 305 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,973 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the article peer group.

Is the redrawn congressional map that Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe signed into law last year already in effect? 
That depends on who you ask. 
Republicans have insisted that the new map has already taken effect. 
Passed in a special session in response to pressure from President Donald Trump, the map splits Kansas City into three parts and aims to oust Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II by making his seat harder for a Democrat to win. 
Cleaver has represented Kansas City’s 3rd District since 2005. 
But Richard Von Glahn, executive director of People Not Politicians, a campaign opposing the new map, says Missouri’s map should be on pause under state law. 
The group submitted 300,000 signatures from Missourians requesting a referendum on the map in December  far more than needed  and it’s expected to go to a statewide vote in November. 
“Up until we turned in the signatures… if we turned in signatures, the 2025 map could not go into effect,” Von Glahn told KCUR’s Up To Date. 
“That’s what they testified in federal court. 
It’s what Secretary of State Hoskins’s initial ballot summary said.” 
A lawsuit on that point, led by the ACLU of Missouri, will be heard in court Tuesday. 
That case will decide whether or not the maps are in place before November, and Von Glahn said it could have a big impact on the midterm elections. 
“We're getting to a point where filing for office is going to take place, and we're getting to a point then where we'll get to primary elections,” Von Glahn said. 
“And are we going to be running in districts and voting in the districts that the legislature passed in 2022 or 2025 makes a tremendous difference on how voters should prepare and how candidates should prepare.” 
Richard Von Glahn, executive director of People Not Politicians 
Confirmation Bias
8.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
9.2%
Framing Effect
38.7%
Loss Aversion
11.8%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
9.2%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
12.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
14.4%
False Dilemma
11.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
10.5%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

305 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.