There Is Good and Evil. Christopher Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ Isn’t Afraid to Say So. 94%

By Spencer Klavan100%

7/17/2026, 7:20:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 705 faulty-reasoning hits from 161 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 90.3% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,204 of 18,654 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the article peer group.

The best parts of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey are the parts in which he simply tells the story of Homer’s original poem. 
This may seem like a low bar. 
It’s not. 
Over the years, it has proven oddly difficult for contemporary filmmakers to adapt this thrilling epic without distorting it, emptying it of its charm, or offering a modern “take.” 
The legend of Odysseus’s 10-year journey home from the Trojan War is so well-beloved and oft-retold, so unabashedly heroic in its proportions, that modern directors have sometimes seemed embarrassed to give The Odyssey its full due without undercutting it or putting an ironic spin on it. 
Nolan doesn’t do that. 
He takes plenty of departures from the source material, but he stays pretty true to its overarching structure and spirit. 
To his great credit, his blockbuster film adaptation—released in theaters worldwide on Friday—largely lets Homer be Homer. 
Confirmation Bias
16.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
18%
Representativeness Heuristic
28.6%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
1.2%
Framing Effect
3.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
4.3%
Negativity Bias
57.1%
Self-Serving Bias
2.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
28.6%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
36.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
10.6%
Primacy Effect
4.3%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
5.6%
False Dilemma
18%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
49.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
10.6%
Begging the Question
1.2%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
13.7%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
28.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
100%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

161 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.