Sarah Longwell and Bill Kristol: We're Governed by Broken Men 85%

By Sarah Longwell91%

7/20/2026, 7:59:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 1,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.2% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,843 of 18,913 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the article peer group.

Trump tried to steal the limelight and the valor of Spain at the World Cup, even as more troops died overseas; Stephen Miller regularly encourages ICE to be violent while Pete Hegseth pushes soldiers to be macho bullies. 
The leaders in this country are men with no center and no core. 
Now with the arrest of the Tate brothers in Miami, Trump gets a chance to extend his record of standing by sex pests and assaulters. 
Plus: Iran and the U.S. are dangerously escalating the war, ICE is going even more rogue, Maine Dems have a replacement for Platner, and generic ballot polling suggests voters aren't necessarily gravitating to Democrats—and the noisy DSA may have a lot to do with that. 
Bill Kristol joins special guest host Sarah Longwell. 
Show notes: 
Monday's "Morning Shots" 
Sam and Mark Hertling on the Iran strikes on an air base in Jordan 
Umberto Eco's "Ur-Fascism" piece 
As always: Watch, listen, hit the like button or leave a comment. 
We want to hear from you. 
An ad-free editions of The Bulwark Podcast are available exclusively for Bulwark+ members. 
The Bulwark Podcast with Tim Miller is available wherever you get podcasts and on YouTube. 
New shows drop each weekday afternoon. 
If you like the show, leave a comment and ⭐⭐⭐⭐ wherever you listen. 
Add The Bulwark Podcast to your player of choice, here. 
Confirmation Bias
45.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
19%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
5.5%
Framing Effect
4.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
55.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
35%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
4.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
26.6%
Straw Man
19%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
40.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
35%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
29.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
5.5%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
5.5%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
14.8%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
16%
Biased Writer Voice
55.3%
Indoctrination
10.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
19%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
16%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
31.6%

237 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.