A Letter to the Free-Speech Hypocrite Who Ran PEN America 74%

By William Kolbrener90%

7/21/2026, 11:39:21 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 419 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.1% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,094 of 19,502 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the article peer group.

This month, Dinaw Mengestu quit as president of PEN America—an organization dedicated to defending literature and free expression—to protest its publication of “A Silent Moratorium,” a report on Israeli and Jewish writers who described facing rising isolation and exclusion. 
The article featured interviews with some 30 writers, editors, and agents who described being ostracized, demonized, and silenced for failing to disavow Israel—and in some cases, for simply being Jewish. 
The piece was denounced by Mengestu, a novelist and journalist, as an “unethical” attempt to interfere with the “constitutional rights” of supporters of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. 
He said the piece was part of PEN America’s “ongoing failure to defend free expression fairly and equitably.” 
When he was hired in December, Mengestu declared that “If we do not make room for the plurality and range of voices embodied in our literature, we endanger not only our culture, but our democracy.” 
That noble aim is incompatible with the zero-sum logic of the BDS movement, which makes “freeing Palestine” contingent on erasing Israel, and insists on anathematizing voices at odds with its master narrative. 
The word “Orwellian” has lost its sting in a world where the mayor of New York promises to enforce “international law” by arresting the prime minister of Israel—in compliance with a court that has no jurisdiction in the United States or Israel—and where an Ivy League student accuses Columbia’s administration of withholding “basic humanitarian aid” because it will not send snacks and water to students illegally occupying a building in the name of “freeing Palestine.” 
But Orwellian is indeed the word, as William Kolbrener, who teaches creative writing at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, demonstrates below in his beautiful open letter to Mengestu. 
One of those interviewed for “A Silent Moratorium,” Kolbrener speaks in the name of the Israelis—Christian, Muslim, and Jewish—whose homeless writing he did his best to publish, and whose voices, like his own, testify that a commitment to free speech, literature, and democracy still matters. 
You resigned this month as president of PEN America, an organization founded to defend writers, to protest a report it had published,  A Silent Moratorium .” 
The report documented something plain: Israeli and Jewish writers have been quietly pushed out of literary life since October 7, 2023—dropped from festivals, passed over for translation or publication, and struck from prize lists. 
You called this an “unethical” legal campaign that threatened the rights of those who wished to silence them. 
Confirmation Bias
15.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
33.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
2.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.4%
Pessimism Bias
7.6%
Negativity Bias
39.9%
Self-Serving Bias
11.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
10.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
7.6%
Halo Effect
10.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
6.4%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
2.4%
Straw Man
7.6%
Appeal to Authority
10.7%
False Dilemma
16%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
8.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
17.9%
Begging the Question
8.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
11.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
10.7%
Anecdotal
17.9%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
17.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
8.1%
Biased Writer Voice
20.8%
Indoctrination
8.4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

419 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.