OutKick88%

Gov. Kathy Hochul's attempt at dunking on President Trump's New York Knicks fandom backfires 78%

By Matt Reigle94%

5/27/2026, 8:15:07 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 64.9% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 367 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,731 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the article peer group.

Everyone is buzzing about the New York Knicks going to the NBA Finals, so much so that President Donald Trump says he's going to head to New York to catch a game. 
Of course, New York Gov. 
Kathy Hochul  who not too long ago was pleading for big-money ex-New Yorkers to return to the state  thought she would try to dunk on the president by questioning his Knicks fandom. 
And, in the process, she wound up majorly embarrassing herself. 
President Trump announced his plans on Wednesday, and Hochul was quickly asked for her response. 
"I’d ask him to name the starting lineup of the 1993 Championship team and see how he does," Hochul said. 
Oh man, Kathy is coming in hot with the sick burn... if only she got the dates right. 
The Chicago Bulls won the NBA Championship in 1993, and the last time the Knicks won it was in 1973. 
It's possible that she was talking about the 1994 NBA Finals  which wrapped up the '93-'94 season  which the Knicks lost to the Houston Rockets. 
No matter how you slice it, this is embarrassing. 
She was either way wrong or trying to pump up a conference championship. 
I mean, even if you ignore the factual disaster that unfolded, is this where politics is at? 
Doing a sports version of, "Oh, you're wearing a Metallica shirt? 
Name five albums, and one of them can't be the Black Album, which is actually called Metallica; people forget that." 
And not only doing that, but muffing it! 
I really don't understand why politicians do this. 
You're not going to win any votes by professing to be a bigger Knicks fan than the president, but you might lose them if people think you're a phony. 
So, how about just steer clear? 
Anyway, it will certainly be interesting to see what happens when the commander in chief heads to Madison Square Garden, where a lot of Knicks fans probably aren't fans of his. 
I mean, Ben Stiller might blow a gasket... if he's at the game and not at some dumb dress-up party. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
17.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
7.6%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
3.5%
Loss Aversion
7.9%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
7.4%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
38.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
8.4%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
1.4%
Blind-Spot Bias
2.2%
Ad Hominem
7.1%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
6%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
11.4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
8.7%
Appeal to Emotion
26.4%
Begging the Question
4.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
20.2%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
16.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
7.1%
Special Pleading
7.4%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
5.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
5.4%
Biased Writer Voice
64.9%
Indoctrination
9.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
4.1%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

367 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.