OutKick88%

Caitlin Clark drops 21 points and 10 assists after WNBA used Raven Johnson in Fever promo graphics 91%

By Alejandro Avila0%

5/18/2026, 1:24:11 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 59.6% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 436 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,531 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the article peer group.

The WNBA’s marketing department might want to log off for a while. 
Just days after choosing Fever rookie Raven Johnson over generational superstar Caitlin Clark to front the promotional graphics for Sunday's matchup against the Seattle Storm, Indiana took the court and let the box score settle the discourse. 
CAITLIN CLARK MAKES WNBA HISTORY AFTER LEAGUE CORRECTS STAT SHEET AHEAD OF FEVER VS STORM MATCHUP 
Indiana secured a commanding 89-78 victory over Seattle, though the real story unfolded in the stark contrast between the league’s forced promotional face and the team's actual focal point, which was a marketing mishap made all the more hilarious by the sudden absence of the team's other primary star, Aliyah Boston. 
With Boston ruled out just before tip-off due to a lower leg injury, the spotlight on Caitlin Clark intensified. 
Clark, who was shockingly snubbed from the league’s official pre-game marketing material despite coming off a historic, stat-corrected 30-point performance against the Mystics, proved exactly why she is the biggest draw in women's basketball. 
Shouldering an even heavier load without Boston in the paint, Clark torched the Storm defense, dropping a team-high 21 points and dishing out 10 assists along with seven rebounds. 
OutKick founder Clay Travis sounded off on the league's ridiculous snub: "Was Michael Jordan ever not the lead graphic on any Bulls game when he was a member of the team? 
You can say this is a small thing, but I would guarantee you Bill Cartwright, Luc Longley & Bill Wennington never got the promo graphic over Jordan. 
Sell the stars! 
Marketing 101." 
On the flip side was Johnson. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
Thrust into the spotlight as the unexpected "poster child" for the Fever in the WNBA’s promotional rollout, Johnson’s on-court production miserably failed to match her sudden marketing billing. 
In 17 minutes of action off the bench, Johnson failed to register a single point, dropping a giant goose egg on the stat sheet. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
While her defensive energy contributed to the team’s depth, a scoreless night highlighted the utter absurdity of the league elevating a backup guard over the most prolific scorer in basketball history, especially on a night when the team was already missing its star center. 
Indiana walks away with a huge win, and the WNBA walks away with another glaring lesson in who actually drives the bus. 
Send us your thoughts: alejandro.avila@outkick.com / Follow along on X: @alejandroaveela 
Confirmation Bias
19.7%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
4.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
6.4%
Hindsight Bias
7.8%
Overconfidence Bias
6.2%
Framing Effect
21.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
31.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
10.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
7.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
4.6%
False Dilemma
11.5%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
28.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
8.3%
Begging the Question
7.8%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
8.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
5%
Anecdotal
6.2%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0.9%
Biased Writer Voice
59.6%
Indoctrination
0.7%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
4.4%

436 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.