Submit a letter to the editor 6%

1/3/2020, 11:08:16 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 48% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 133 faulty-reasoning hits from 125 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of 6% (15,884 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the article peer group.

Please use the form below to submit a letter to the editor of the Los Angeles Times. 
You can also submit your letter in an email to letters@latimes.com. 
Fill in your full name, mailing address, city of residence, phone number and e-mail address. 
Submissions that do not include this information cannot be published. 
We generally do not publish more than one letter from a single person within any 60-day period. 
Letters become the property of The Times and may be republished in any format. 
They typically run 150 words or less and may be edited. 
You will be contacted if your letter is a candidate for publication. 
For technical questions or comments about the website, please contact customer service. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
8.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
13.6%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
9.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
9.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
48%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
8.8%

125 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.