Homan pushes back on Catholic Church’s opposition to mass deportations: ‘Illegal migration is not a victimless crime’0%

By Blake Wolf (OAN Staff)0%

12/12/2025, 9:08:27 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 484 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

White House Border Czar Tom Homan speaks with the press outside of the West Wing of the White House in Washington, D.C., November 14, 2025. 
(SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images) 
Border czar Tom Homan pushed back on the Catholic Church for condemning the Trump administration's mass deportation campaign, calling on church leaders to spend a day with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to see "why illegal immigration is not a victimless crime." 
On Wednesday, the U.S. Conference of Bishops released a statement criticizing the Trump administration's "indiscriminate mass deportation of people." 
"We are disturbed when we see among our people a climate of fear and anxiety around questions of profiling and immigration enforcement," the Bishops wrote in a statement. 
"We are saddened by the state of contemporary debate and the vilification of immigrants." 
The Bishops also expressed concern over the "conditions in detention centers and the lack of access to pastoral care," adding that "human dignity and national security are not in conflict." 
Homan responded to the statement, declaring: "The Catholic Church is wrong." 
"I'm a lifelong Catholic, but I'm saying it not only as a border czar, but I'm also saying this as a Catholic," he stated. 
"A secure border saves lives. 
We're going to enforce the law and by doing that we save a lot of lives." 
"As President Trump promised on day one, we're going to enforce immigration law," Homan continued. 
"That's what he was voted into office to do, and that's what we're doing. 
We're going to keep this promise to the American people." 
"We're going to prioritize public safety threats and national security threats," he noted. 
"The majority of people we arrest  have a criminal history. 
But also, like I've said from day one, if you're in the country illegally, you're not off the table." 
Homan went on to invite Catholic leadership to speak with him, and suggested that they go and talk to the parents of American citizens who were "killed by someone that wasn't supposed to be here." 
"When you come across the border illegally, not only is it a crime, but you're cheating the system," he explained. 
"There are millions of people, millions that are standing in line, taking their test, doing the background investigation, paying their fees to be part of the greatest nation on Earth." 
"The most humane thing you can do is enforce the law, secure the border, because it saves lives. 
The Catholic Church should support keeping the community safe again. 
But I'm saying this, if you're in the country legally, it's not okay. 
Illegal migration is not a victimless crime. 
I wish Catholic leadership would go with me. 
Take a border trip with me," Homan said. 
"Look at some of the investigations I do. 
Wear my shoes  You may not agree with me 100% in the end, but you will certainly understand the importance of border security." 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
3.9%
Availability Heuristic
11.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
24%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
34.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
4.1%
Halo Effect
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
13.2%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
17.4%
Optimism Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
2.3%
Overconfidence Bias
14.3%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
2.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
2.3%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
22.9%
Appeal to Authority
14.3%
Appeal to Emotion
34.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
2.9%
Begging the Question
15.7%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
6.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
5%
Hasty Generalization
9.5%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
6.2%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
2.9%
Tu Quoque
0%

484 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.