Newsmax75%

Sen. Kelly Rips Hegseth as 'Totally Unqualified'0%

By Mark Swanson0%

11/26/2025, 11:12:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 943 faulty-reasoning hits from 455 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., went on the attack against Pete Hegseth during a late-night TV appearance, calling the War secretary "totally unqualified" and dismissing the uproar over the "illegal orders" video he helped craft. 
Kelly made the comments on "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" that aired Tuesday night. 
Earlier in the day, Hegseth blasted Kelly and the five other Democrat lawmakers for "sowing doubt" among U.S. service members. 
"I don't know Pete Hegseth well. 
I sit on the committee that ultimately had to confirm him, so I know a little about his background. 
He's totally unqualified," Kelly said on Kimmel. 
Kelly still voted to advance Hegseth's nomination out of the Senate Armed Services Committee, even though he later opposed him on the final confirmation vote. 
"Nothing against journalists, they play a very important role in our society, but he is not qualified for this job. 
And from what I can tell in talking to some of my Republican colleagues, I mean, he just wants to please the president," Kelly added. 
Kelly, Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., and four other Democrats sparked controversy last week with a video urging military and intelligence personnel to ignore what they claimed were "illegal orders." 
Hegseth on Tuesday said their instruction "carries a different weight inside the military." 
"As veterans of various sorts, the Seditious Six knew exactly what they were doing  sowing doubt through a politically motivated influence operation," Hegseth said in a post on X. 
The Department of War on Monday signaled that it's considering potential legal action against Kelly, a retired Navy combat pilot and former NASA astronaut. 
"He can go after me under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which is the law in the military, which is kind of wild, because we recited something in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and he is going to prosecute me under the Uniform Code of Military Justice," Kelly told Kimmel. 
"It is so ridiculous. 
It's almost like you can't make this s*** up," he told Kimmel. 
Kelly told Kimmel how he first learned of Trump's reaction to the video, recalling that he and Slotkin were in a briefing when a staffer slipped her a note. 
"Somebody comes in during the brief, hands her a piece of paper, and I look at it," Kelly said. 
"It says, 'The president is calling for your execution'  directed at Elissa. 
She looks at me, walks out, and five minutes later comes back and says, 'Well, he's calling for your execution too.' 
So I wasn't off the hook." 
Trump never directly called for their execution. 
His posts instead read: "Each one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL," adding the broader context: "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
2.9%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
5.5%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
36.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
18.2%
Halo Effect
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
4.4%
In-Group Bias
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
23.1%
Optimism Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
17.1%
Overconfidence Bias
2.4%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
36%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
5.5%
Appeal to Authority
4.2%
Appeal to Emotion
16.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
11.4%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
6.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
11%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0.9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
5.5%

455 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.