Trump orders temporary warnings signs be put in front of Smithsonian after report finds ‘extreme political activism’ 95%

By Emily Hallas53%

7/25/2026, 1:07:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.9% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 1,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 496 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.1% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,110 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump on Friday ordered the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History to put up signs highlighting a report that concluded the country’s leading cultural center put ideological bias over historical facts. 
The 162-page report from the White House’s Domestic Policy Council was released earlier this month, and it wrote that “ideological capture has moved the Museum’s mission away from straightforward historical education and scholarship toward an extreme political activism that seeks to transform our country.” 
In response, Trump ordered Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and the National Park Service, which maintains the sidewalks outside the museum, to point visitors to the report on temporary signage along walkways that lead to the museum, in addition to signage above each entrance that reads: “Warning: the exhibits in this museum were prepared by people who don’t want you to love your country.” 
The signage will correct “inaccurate information presented in the Museum” and direct visitors to “locations and resources for accurate information regarding America’s history,” according to Trump. 
The move comes as the president and his team have long targeted the Smithsonian Institution, which receives roughly two-thirds of its approximately $1 billion annual budget through federal appropriations, over concerns it puts leftist ideology over an accurate portrayal of U.S. history. 
In March, Trump directed Vice President JD Vance and the Domestic Policy Council to “remove improper ideology” from Smithsonian museums and suggest “actions necessary to fully effectuate such policies.” 
Through an executive order , he targeted funding for programs that advanced “divisive narratives” and “improper ideology.” 
Earlier this week, Smithsonian National Museum of American History director Anthea Hartig was pressed by Republicans on several exhibits at the institution, including one lawmakers said suggested Mickey Mouse was racist, and concerns about children engaging with a sexually explicit LGBT exhibit that displayed a “crotch harness” in “Illegal to be You: Gay History Beyond Stonewall” exhibit. 
Hartig defended the institution and clapped back against the July 4 White House report. 
“As we continue to fact-check the report, we unwaveringly attest that it does not fairly or accurately characterize the full body of work at the museum,” she told lawmakers. 
“There is always room for improvement. 
But I also know the beauty and the inspiration and the expertise that lies in our collections, our exhibits, and our programming.” 
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACCUSED OF POSSIBLE FRAUD OVER SEX-CHANGE ‘CARE’ 
Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch also defended the institution in comments to NBC News earlier this month, arguing that the White House’s July 4 report writing that the White House’s report “is not a fair characterization of the work and totality of the National Museum of American History.” 
“At the Smithsonian, our work is driven by scholarship, accuracy and an uncompromising commitment to tell the fullness of America’s story,” Bunch wrote. 
The institution remains “focused on what grounds us: a steadfast commitment to scholarship, nonpartisanship, independence, accuracy, and integrity.” 
Confirmation Bias
11.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
11.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
36.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
8.9%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
1.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
56.9%
Self-Serving Bias
18.1%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
8.5%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
11.5%
Halo Effect
12.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
12.7%
Appeal to Authority
6.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
8.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
29.4%
Begging the Question
8.9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
11.1%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
11.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
18.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
8.9%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
8.1%
Indoctrination
18.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
8.5%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

496 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.