The Drive58%

What’s the Point of Concept Cars Anymore? We Asked the People Who Design Them 82%

By Caleb Jacobs62%

7/17/2026, 6:30:21 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Recency Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,089 of 17,066 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the article peer group.

As someone who aspired to write about cars for a living largely because of the cool concept cars from my youth, I'm sorry to report that today's moonshot design projects no longer get me goin'. 
At least, very few of them do. 
Have I grown jaded over the years? 
Or are concept cars not what they used to be? 
What if both are true? 
Or neither? 
I know I'm not alone in feeling like this. 
It's a conversation we have fairly often in The Drive's Slack. 
And when a topic is discussed so much in our group chats, we invoke Slack Law and write about it. 
(The idea here is that if we find it interesting enough to talk about time and again, then other people may find it interesting, too.) 
Well, our Editor-in-Chief Kyle Cheromcha took it a step further and made a 30-minute film on concept cars, featuring five of automotive's most influential designers. 
From first to last: Alex Shen (Toyota CALTY), Jon Ikeda (Acura), Tom Peters (General Motors), Ralph Gilles (Stellantis), and Sangyup Lee (Hyundai and Genesis) 
The latest video on The Drive's YouTube channel features Alex Shen from Toyota's CALTY Design Research Lab, who penned the FT-1 concept that became the new Supra; Jon Ikeda, former head of Acura design who styled the front-engine NSX concept; Tom Peters, the former head of performance car design at GM who designed the Indy Corvette, the 2007 Camaro concept, and more; Ralph Gilles, global head of design for Stellantis; and Sangyup Lee, the head of design for Hyundai and Genesis. 
Droves of internet commenters lament that concept cars are "uninspired," but spend time around the folks who draw, sculpt, and build them, and your opinion may change. 
Kyle's hunch that something else has caused this vibe shift is the thrust of the video, and having watched the clip in its entirety, I agree. 
(And no, I'm not brown-nosing. 
Promise!) 
I encourage you to hear from these design pros directly, not so you can buy into some corporate apologetic that blames less exciting concepts on shrunken budgets, but so you can get a glimpse into the process from people who devote their life's work to creative expression. 
As you can probably guess, it's not easy for said creativity to live in the same world as engineering constraints and safety regulations. 
But designers—at least, the ones we spoke with—make it work because they love cars like you and me. 
And after listening to Kyle's full chat with Jon Ikeda on The Drivecast, I'm inclined to believe he loves cars even more than I do. 
Got a tip or question for the author? 
Contact them directly: caleb@thedrive.com 
Confirmation Bias
11.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
30.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
11.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
2.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
5%
Pessimism Bias
9.2%
Negativity Bias
17.2%
Self-Serving Bias
1.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
11.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
19.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
23.3%
Primacy Effect
5.4%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
10.2%
Appeal to Authority
24.6%
False Dilemma
3.7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
4.4%
Hasty Generalization
9.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
2%
Appeal to Emotion
14.2%
Begging the Question
5%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
10.2%
Appeal to Nature
5%
Composition/Division
5.4%
Anecdotal
23.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
1.1%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
7.6%
Indoctrination
10.2%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
2.6%

459 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.