MS NOW95%

Trump touts plummeting federal employment: ‘Big news for the USA!’0%

By Jordan Rubin0%

12/26/2025, 6:06:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 65.3% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 577 faulty-reasoning hits from 213 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump this week touted his administration’s dramatic cuts to the federal workforce, as remaining workers steeled themselves for another potential government shutdown  and more possible cuts  in the new year. 
“Big news for the USA!” 
Trump wrote in a post on his social media site, over a graph that showed plummeting federal employment. 
The post cited jobs numbers from earlier this month showing federal employment at its lowest in more than a decade, down 271,000 jobs since he took office. 
The Trump administration casts those numbers in a wholly positive light, as indicative of a strong private sector, even as the labor market stalls. 
MS NOW’s Emily Hung recently reported on the depressing holiday season facing federal workers, who fear not only for their jobs, but another government shutdown looming in 2026 and a potential Trump administration regulatory overhaul that would make it easier to terminate career civil servants. 
A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention employee told Hung that there’s “fear in the air” among federal workers, and that they’re “walking on eggshells.” 
A PBS News/NPR/Marist poll this month found that more Americans than ever disapprove of the president’s handling of the economy. 
Americans also expressed concerns over the cost of living, health care prices and personal finances. 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
12.7%
Availability Heuristic
11.7%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
11.3%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
35.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Loss Aversion
21.1%
Negativity Bias
65.3%
Optimism Bias
13.6%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
21.1%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
9.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
13.6%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
11.3%
Anecdotal
11.7%
Appeal to Authority
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.3%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
21.1%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

213 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.