MS NOW⁠98%

Stephanie Grisham files temporary restraining order against Rep. Max Miller ⁠22%

By Carla Herreria⁠34%

8/3/2026, 5:41:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 508 faulty-reasoning hits from 453 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,936 of 29,351 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the article peer group.

Former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham filed a temporary restraining order against Rep. 
Max Miller, R-Ohio, her attorney announced Monday . 
Grisham’s restraining order comes as Miller, 37, faces mounting calls to resign in light of allegations made by his ex-wife Emily Moreno — daughter of Sen. 
Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio — that the congressman physically abused her and their 2-year-old daughter. 
Miller has denied the allegations, which were made in court filings as part of the former couple’s ongoing custody dispute. 
It was unclear in the immediate aftermath of that announcement why the restraining order is being filed at this time. 
Grisham and Miller, who dated in 2019 and 2020, have been involved in a separate legal battle, after Grisham published a 2021 op-ed in the Washington Post describing an abusive relationship with her boyfriend who was, at the time, a White House staffer. 
While Grisham did not disclose the name of her boyfriend, Miller sued her for defamation hours after the op-ed was published and denied any allegations of abuse. 
At the time, Miller was running for a House seat in Ohio’s 16th Congressional District. 
Miller later dropped his defamation lawsuit against Grisham and both parties signed a nondisclosure agreement that noted they could not speak about each other in disparaging ways, according to court documents obtained by the Ohio Capital Journal . 
“The settlement included certain promises that Congressman Miller made to our client Stephanie Grisham, and those promises were broken,” Marc Dann, Grisham’s lawyer, told the Journal. 
“The settlement included certain promises that Congressman Miller made to our client Stephanie Grisham, and those promises were broken.” 
Marc Dann, Grisham’s lawyer 
Miller currently represents Ohio’s 7th Congressional District. 
President Donald Trump weighed in on the situation on Monday. 
“I always thought he was a very good person, and I’m going to let the families figure that out,” Trump told reporters. 
Sen. 
Bernie Moreno did not speak directly about his daughter’s domestic violence allegations against Miller until Sunday, when Miller aired a livestream denying the accusations and asserting he was not ending his bid for reelection. 
Sen. 
Moreno responded by saying Miller “should not serve in the House of Representatives” and should “seek professional help to end the clear pattern of abuse he has left in his wake.” 
Asked by reporters on Monday why he had stayed quiet for so long, Sen. 
Moreno replied: “You know, I hope you never have to go through a situation like this and you wouldn’t ask that kind of f—–g question.” 
Mychael Schnell contributed to this report. 
The post Stephanie Grisham files temporary restraining order against Rep. 
Max Miller appeared first on MS NOW . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 7.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Carla Herreria: 0.8%MS NOW: 3.6%Availability Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Carla Herreria: 1.5%MS NOW: 14.5%Framing Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Carla Herreria: 2.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect8.4%This article: 4.9%Carla Herreria: 1.2%MS NOW: 2.3%Optimism Bias4.9%This article: 4.4%Carla Herreria: 1.1%MS NOW: 3.1%Pessimism Bias4.4%This article: 18.3%Carla Herreria: 6.8%MS NOW: 18.2%Negativity Bias18.3%This article: 10.2%Carla Herreria: 2.5%MS NOW: 2.3%Self-Serving Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Carla Herreria: 1.4%MS NOW: 3.3%In-Group Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Carla Herreria: 2.4%MS NOW: 2.0%Halo Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Carla Herreria: 3.8%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 2.4%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 1.4%MS NOW: 4.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.2%Carla Herreria: 1.8%MS NOW: 5.0%Appeal to Authority2.2%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 1.7%MS NOW: 7.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.2%Carla Herreria: 4.3%MS NOW: 9.3%Appeal to Emotion17.2%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.8%Carla Herreria: 1.7%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof6.8%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.1%Carla Herreria: 0.8%MS NOW: 2.5%Anecdotal3.1%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.5%Carla Herreria: 1.4%MS NOW: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.5%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 1.0%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.2%Carla Herreria: 1.0%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 13.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 5.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carla Herreria: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

453 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers43%attributed speech258writer words
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words11% of attributed speech52% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.