Hunting and Fishing Ban Fails to Make November Ballot 40%

By Aaron Mesh76%

7/24/2026, 11:56:14 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 690 faulty-reasoning hits from 293 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (13,251 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the article peer group.

Initiative Petition 28, an animal rights measure that sought to criminalize hunting, fishing, ranching and pest control in Oregon, has failed to make the November ballot after state election officials say it failed two rounds of signature verification. 
Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read’s office announced the disqualification late Friday afternoon. 
The IP 28 campaign submitted 142,784 signatures on July 2. 
To qualify for the ballot, the petition needed 117,173 verified signatures. 
That would require 82% of the submitted signatures to be valid. 
On two rounds of testing, the Elections Division said, sample batches of signatures failed to meet that threshold. 
(WW reported the first failure on July 16.) 
The Elections Division said that just 104,262 of the submitted signatures, or 73.25%, were valid. 
The initiative petition, submitted by a Portland substitute teacher, would have classified any killing of an animal in Oregon except in self-defense as a Class A misdemeanor. 
That would have effectively outlawed hunting, fishing, slaughtering livestock for meat, or killing rats or other pests. 
As the initiative, backed by large contributions from animal rights groups, moved closer to the ballot, it became a political liability for Oregon Democrats, who denounced it but still saw Republicans try to tar them with it as election season ramped up. 
Shortly after the Elections Division announcement, Gov. 
Tina Kotek issued a statement saying she was “relieved” by the petition’s failure. 
“Efforts to criminalize activities like hunting and fishing are wrong for Oregon,” Kotek said. 
“I know from conversations with Oregonians across the state that this measure would have done nothing to help them. 
This is a win for tribal leaders, family farmers, ranchers, and every Oregonian who cares about protecting our lands and wildlife.” 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
3.8%
Availability Heuristic
6.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.1%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
8.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
4.8%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
7.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
36.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
19.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
7.2%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5.1%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
9.2%
Appeal to Authority
6.1%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
5.8%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
6.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
7.2%
Appeal to Emotion
11.9%
Begging the Question
4.8%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
14.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
5.1%
Biased Writer Voice
35.2%
Indoctrination
4.4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
14.3%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

293 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.