St. Petersburg crosswalk upgrades: City improves school zone safety 29%

7/31/2026, 2:55:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 544 faulty-reasoning hits from 598 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (18,006 of 25,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the article peer group.

St. 
Petersburg officials are upgrading crosswalks near St. 
Pete High School after a student was hit by a car and critically injured in May. 
Student crosswalk crash details 
According to the St. 
Petersburg Police Department, a 15-year-old student pressed the crosswalk button to activate warning lights near Ninth Avenue North and 25th Street North in May, started walking, and a driver hit and critically injured him. 
According to SPPD, the driver was cited for not exercising care to "avoid colliding with any pedestrian or any person propelling a human-powered vehicle." 
Now, city crews are installing safety upgrades to crosswalks on Ninth Avenue North at 25th Street North and 26th Street North behind the school. 
Crews refreshed the paint on the crosswalks to make them brighter, and installed taller, fluorescent signage. 
They also added a second set of flashing lights to better attract drivers' attention. 
Next week they’ll add fluorescent stripes to the poles and visors on top of the lights to direct the light better for drivers. 
"Now we have double the lights to flash toward the motorist to let them know that a pedestrian is in the crosswalk," Cheryl Stacks, Transportation Manager City of St. 
Pete, said. 
"So, we think that that's really going to help catch people's eyes." 
Zachery Palmer, who lives nearby, thinks it already has. 
"I've noticed that they have slowed down a little bit sooner as we are trying to cross now," Palmer said. 
Additional work includes widening sidewalk ramps at the intersections and repairing broken sidewalks along Ninth Avenue North. 
"We do see that speeds are relatively high on Ninth Avenue North, and it is a residential area, so there's, you know, we would like people to be able to feel safe and comfortable to cross the street. 
We have students who need to cross this street here at the school, so we want to make sure that we're providing an environment and infrastructure that gives everybody the best opportunity to stay safe," Stacks said. 
Community traffic safety reaction 
Ryan Becker, who lives on Ninth Avenue, hopes the upgrades do just that. 
"The more in your face it is, the signage for the cars, the sooner they stop, the more willing they are to stop, the safer it is for the crossing kids," Becker said. 
"I think it's a good addition to the neighborhood." 
The upgrades will be done by the first day of school, and Stacks has a message for everyone as that day approaches. 
"Stay alert and have some situational awareness. 
So, just making sure that you're staying alert to the fact that people are going to be walking. 
There might be children biking to school. 
As a motorist, keep paying attention to the roadway and looking around you to make sure that there's, you know, that you- you're paying attention," she said. 
City officials say they’re working on adding safer crosswalks through its Complete Streets program citywide. 
On the other side of St. 
Pete High School, Fifth Avenue North is under the state’s jurisdiction. 
FDOT, Stacks said, upgraded the crosswalks there a couple of years ago. 
"Those have a different technology because the roadway is busier. 
It's intended to be a more regional thoroughfare, more so than our neighborhood street of Ninth Avenue North. 
So, it's better for us to have something side mounted on Ninth Avenue. 
It's going to be a little bit more contextually appropriate, but we just need to make sure that it's highly visible and that's what those added lights will let us do," Stacks said. 
Confirmation Bias
3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
2.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
2.5%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
6.4%
Self-Serving Bias
5.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
4.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.5%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
17.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
3.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
1.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
2.2%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
9.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

598 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.