Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer now a special assistant to Hegseth 17%

By Jeff Schogol9%

7/28/2026, 9:24:07 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 539 faulty-reasoning hits from 495 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (25,309 of 30,190 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the article peer group.

Dakota Meyer, who was awarded the Medal of Honor in 2011 and rejoined the Marines last year after more than a decade as a civilian, is now a special assistant to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to the Pentagon. 
No information about Meyer’s responsibilities in his new role was immediately available. 
Meyer, a sergeant in the Marine Reserve, was awarded the Medal of Honor for rescuing dozens of U.S. and allied troops in a 2009 ambush in Afghanistan. 
He left the Marines in 2010. 
Meyer reenlisted in the Marine Reserve in 2025 and completed the service’s arduous Basic Reconnaissance Course in April . 
Meyer’s role in Hegseth’s office appears to be as a civilian. 
He is classified as a special government employee in his new role while he remains in the Marine Reserve, said Joel Valdez, the Pentagon’s acting press secretary. 
On Monday, Meyer shared photos on social media showing him being sworn into his new job by retired Army Sgt. 
Maj. 
Eric Geressy, senior advisor to Hegseth. 
“Raising my right hand and taking the oath again was a reminder that service is a lifelong commitment,” Meyer wrote in a Monday social media post. 
“I don’t take that responsibility lightly, and I’m committed to serving our Service Members, their families, and the American people to the very best of my ability.” 
Reenlisted with ‘more to give’ 
In 2011, Meyer became the first living Marine to receive the Medal of Honor since the Vietnam War. 
Two years earlier, he rescued a total of 36 U.S. and Afghan troops and helped recover four fallen American service members after the Taliban ambushed his unit in Kunar Province, Afghanistan. 
Though he was out of the Marine Corps when he received the Medal, he reenlisted in the Marine Reserve last year. 
“I realized I had more to give,” Meyer told reporters in April 2025. 
“I love this country with every moral fiber of my being. 
I always have. 
The same reason that I joined 20 years ago is the same reason I’m coming back in. 
I’ve just got more to give, and it’s just such an honor to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the men and women wearing the nation’s cloth today.” 
After returning to the Marines as an infantry rifleman, Meyer earned the Reconnaissance Marine military occupational specialty in April when he completed the 12-week Basic Reconnaissance Course. 
Meyer wrote on social media that he is honored to serve under Hegsteh, whom he described as a friend. 
He also thanked Geressy for giving him the opportunity to take on his new job. 
In a separate post, Geressy praised Meyer for “once again answering the call” to serve the country. 
“For someone who has already given so much in service to our Nation, seeing Dakota once again raise his right hand and swear to continue serving the American people and our Service Members was both humbling and inspiring,” Geressy wrote. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.6%Task & Purpose: 1.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.9%Task & Purpose: 1.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.6%Jeff Schogol: 0.4%Task & Purpose: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.2%Task & Purpose: 2.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.6%Task & Purpose: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.2%Task & Purpose: 0.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Jeff Schogol: 0.4%Task & Purpose: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.2%This article: 8.1%Jeff Schogol: 3.2%Task & Purpose: 1.7%Optimism Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 1.8%Task & Purpose: 3.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Jeff Schogol: 0.5%Task & Purpose: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 2.2%Jeff Schogol: 0.2%Task & Purpose: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error2.2%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.6%Jeff Schogol: 3.9%Task & Purpose: 1.8%Halo Effect15.6%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 1.6%Task & Purpose: 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.3%Jeff Schogol: 2.5%Task & Purpose: 1.6%Appeal to Authority13.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 2.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.3%Task & Purpose: 1.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.4%Jeff Schogol: 0.3%Task & Purpose: 0.2%Bandwagon3.4%This article: 29.5%Jeff Schogol: 3.0%Task & Purpose: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion29.5%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.8%Jeff Schogol: 1.4%Task & Purpose: 1.6%Anecdotal4.8%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.3%Jeff Schogol: 1.8%Task & Purpose: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.3%Jeff Schogol: 3.3%Task & Purpose: 2.0%Unattributed Quote9.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.5%Task & Purpose: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.2%Jeff Schogol: 2.3%Task & Purpose: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice2.2%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 0.0%Task & Purpose: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Schogol: 1.4%Task & Purpose: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

495 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers42%attributed speech289writer words
Selected voice

Geressy

100%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words28% of attributed speech44% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Geressy: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Geressy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.