amny.com45%

Midtown knife attack: Three injured, one man arrested in bloody end to Times Square fight 17%

By Dean Moses51%

7/22/2026, 12:35:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 181 faulty-reasoning hits from 232 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.2% and a BS Rank of 17% (16,534 of 19,899 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the article peer group.

Three people were injured late on Tuesday night in a bloody knife attack near Times Square , police reported. 
Sources said a man has been charged for the violent stabbing and slashing that occurred just before 11:40 p.m. on July 21 outside of an Applebee’s restaurant at the corner of West 50th Street and Broadway. 
Officers from the Midtown North Precinct received a 911 call reporting that a dispute had turned violent. 
Police learned that one of the individuals involved in the argument, identified as 24-year-old Preshan Bennett, allegedly went on the attack, using a sharp object to slice and stab his foes. 
Upon arriving at the scene, the officers found a 24-year-old man with a stab wound to the torso and a slash wound to the left leg, a 26-year-old man with slash wounds to his hands and left leg, and an unknown man with slash wounds to his leg. 
All three victims were rushed to Bellevue Hospital, where they were treated for their injuries. 
They are each expected to survive. 
Meanwhile, police took Bennett into custody near the scene. 
Following questioning, he was charged with assault, menacing, and criminal possession of a weapon. 
Through July 19, the Midtown North Precinct reported a 4.2% increase in felony assaults, from 191 last year to 199 this year. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
9.5%
Availability Heuristic
9.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
12.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
2.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
14.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.4%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
9.5%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
6.5%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

232 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.