SEPTA sees continued drop in serious crimes compared to last year, officials say 96%

By Hayden Mitman NBC10

7/29/2026, 10:24:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41.5% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 409 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.3% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,034 of 23,243 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the article peer group.

SEPTA sees continued drop in serious crimes compared to last year, officials say 
After claiming that it has seen its lowest serious crime rate since, at least, 2015, earlier this year, SEPTA officials on Wednesday said they have seen continued reductions in serious crimes in the second quarter of this year, compared to the same time last year. 
In a report released Wednesday, SEPTA officials said, over the course of the second quarter of 2026, when compared to the same time period last year, the transit system has seen a 21% reduction in serious crimes, including a 40% decrease in aggravated assault incidents. 
However, for the second quarter this year, officials noted, SEPTA did see two arsons, 30 robberies and a murder. 
Still, SEPTA officials said they saw "crime reductions of double-digit percentage points on the [L] Market-Frankford Line, [B] Broad Street Line and buses." 
For the full story, visit NBCPhiladelphia. 
Confirmation Bias
27.4%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
27.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
41.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
27.4%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
39%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
14%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
27.4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
14%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
27.4%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
3.7%

164 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.