Drone program expands to new Florida districts, aims to improve response times during school shootings 47%

By Litzy Grijalba51%

7/24/2026, 3:34:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 151 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.6% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,691 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the article peer group.

JACKSONVILLE, Fla.  A company is creating high-tech help for Florida schools. 
Campus Guardian Angel in Jacksonville demonstrated its school-safety drone program. 
They plan to deploy their system at schools across multiple counties, including Broward, for the upcoming fall. 
Their drones are equipped with strobes, sirens, and pepper spray. 
They are remotely operated from Austin, Texas. 
“What most people don’t realize is school shootings typically last 120 seconds. 
So Parkland, Westside, and a lot of these shootings are over in 120 seconds, really before police have the opportunity to get there in mass. 
So just like the sprinkler system, we are there already. 
We can get after that person in seconds,” said a company official. 
The Florida legislature has authorized expanding the pilot program to three additional school districts to be selected at a later time. 
Confirmation Bias
16.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
16.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
7.9%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
7.9%
False Dilemma
16.6%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
24.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
16.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.9%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
39.1%

151 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.