Trump attorney general pick Todd Blanche faces final hurdle before confirmation vote 10%

By Kaelan Deese45%

8/4/2026, 6:16:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Recency Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 472 faulty-reasoning hits from 673 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of 10% (24,763 of 27,513 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the article peer group.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is poised to clear a crucial hurdle Tuesday morning after two Republican holdouts announced Monday that they would support advancing his nomination to lead the Justice Department permanently. 
Sens. 
John Cornyn (R-TX) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) said Monday that they would vote for Blanche during the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Tuesday meeting, resolving an impasse that forced the panel to postpone consideration of his nomination last week. 
The committee is scheduled to convene at 9 a.m., and Blanche’s nomination will be the only agenda item the lawmakers will consider ahead of the start of the August recess later this week. 
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. 
Kennedy Jr., from left, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Vice President JD Vance attend a cabinet meeting, Friday, July 31, 2026, at Camp David, the presidential retreat, near Thurmont, Md., Friday, July 31, 2026. 
(AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) 
Cornyn and Tillis’s support rebound followed a late-Sunday agreement under which the DOJ formally terminated a controversial “anti-eeaponization fund” and clarified the scope of tax audit protections included in a May settlement between President Donald Trump and the IRS. 
“We want to express our gratitude to Mr. 
Blanche and his staff for working with us on this, and we look forward to voting to advance his nomination out of the Senate Judiciary Committee soon,” Cornyn and Tillis said in a joint statement Monday. 
A successful committee vote Tuesday would position Blanche for confirmation by the full Senate later this week, before senators leave Washington until Sept. 
14. 
Cornyn and Tillis had demanded binding assurances that the roughly $1.8 billion fund could not be revived and that protections from IRS audits would not extend beyond the plaintiffs in Trump’s lawsuit. 
The proposed fund was intended to compensate people who claimed they had been unfairly targeted by the DOJ, prompting concerns that Jan. 6 defendants could receive payments. 
In a written order issued late Sunday, Blanche said no members had been appointed to administer the fund, no money had been transferred, and no claims had been paid. 
My team and I have met with committee members and Senators over the past several weeks and addressed any concerns or outstanding questions. 
We have enjoyed good faith discussions, and as a result issue the following order and update with regard to the May IRS settlement. 
The… pic.twitter.com/U6hs15kw2D 
 Acting AG Todd Blanche (@DAGToddBlanche) August 3, 2026 
The department also clarified that the audit agreement applies retroactively to claims open when the settlement was reached, does not cover future tax filings, and is limited to Trump, two of his sons, and the Trump Organization. 
Cornyn and Tillis said Monday that those actions also addressed concerns shared by other Republicans, including Sens. 
Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Susan Collins (R-ME), John Curtis (R-UT), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK). 
Democrats argued that the agreement does not foreclose other avenues for compensating Jan. 6 defendants. 
Sen. 
Adam Schiff (D-CA) said Sunday that the deal “doesn’t prevent payouts to violent insurrectionists in the future” and leaves questions about the breadth of Trump’s tax protections. 
Blanche’s nomination appeared in jeopardy after the committee postponed a vote scheduled for Thursday. 
Trump subsequently threatened to withdraw the nomination and suggested on Saturday that he could revive the compensation proposal, or ask Congress to create it through legislation. 
Tillis responded over the weekend that such a move could derail a nominee he otherwise considered qualified, adding that he hoped the dispute could be resolved by Tuesday. 
CORNYN REACHES DEAL WITH DOJ AHEAD OF TODD BLANCHE NOMINATION VOTE 
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) scheduled Tuesday’s meeting to give the White House more time to secure the necessary votes. 
His office said Friday that Grassley wanted Blanche confirmed before the recess, praising his record of “restoring law and order and keeping Americans safe.” 
Blanche, Trump’s former criminal defense attorney, joined the DOJ as deputy attorney general before becoming acting attorney general following Pam Bondi ’s ouster in April. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%Kaelan Deese: 2.9%Washington Examiner: 4.9%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 2.2%Washington Examiner: 2.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.4%Washington Examiner: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.1%Kaelan Deese: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 5.4%Washington Examiner: 8.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.2%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.8%Kaelan Deese: 3.3%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Optimism Bias6.8%This article: 4.2%Kaelan Deese: 0.6%Washington Examiner: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 6.2%Kaelan Deese: 2.6%Washington Examiner: 8.8%Negativity Bias6.2%This article: 3.4%Kaelan Deese: 1.7%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 3.5%Washington Examiner: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.8%Washington Examiner: 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Kaelan Deese: 3.4%Washington Examiner: 2.0%Halo Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Kaelan Deese: 1.5%Washington Examiner: 1.6%Recency Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 2.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.4%Washington Examiner: 1.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.6%Kaelan Deese: 3.5%Washington Examiner: 3.7%Appeal to Authority3.6%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.6%Washington Examiner: 2.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 4.2%Kaelan Deese: 0.6%Washington Examiner: 1.4%Slippery Slope4.2%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 2.9%Washington Examiner: 7.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.1%Washington Examiner: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.0%Kaelan Deese: 2.4%Washington Examiner: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion8.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.4%Washington Examiner: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.9%Kaelan Deese: 2.6%Washington Examiner: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.9%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.1%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.4%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 2.1%Washington Examiner: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.1%Washington Examiner: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.3%Kaelan Deese: 2.3%Washington Examiner: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.3%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.2%Kaelan Deese: 0.5%Washington Examiner: 2.0%Unattributed Quote1.2%This article: 1.2%Kaelan Deese: 1.1%Washington Examiner: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 2.8%Washington Examiner: 10.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 3.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.1%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.9%Washington Examiner: 4.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaelan Deese: 0.5%Washington Examiner: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

673 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers40%attributed speech402writer words
Selected voice

John Tillis

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words10% of attributed speech51% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote-2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%John Tillis: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%John Tillis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.