Trump says ICE traffic stops should continue despite new policy to halt them 38%

By Catherine Dominguez16%

7/15/2026, 12:59:12 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 842 faulty-reasoning hits from 203 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.8% and a BS Rank of 38% (9,987 of 15,884 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump says traffic stops by U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement should continue, calling them the country's "most important and effective" crime-fighting tool in a social media post early Wednesday. 
The post to Truth Social comes on the heels of reports of a new policy to halt the stops. 
"The men and women of ICE are doing a GREAT job, one that has to be done. 
CRIME IS WAY DOWN IN AMERICA, in many cases with numbers that haven’t been seen in decades," Trump posted, adding that stopping the traffic stops is "playing right into the criminal's hands." 
INVESTIGATION: Houston Mayor John Whitmire asks Texas Rangers to investigate fatal ICE shooting 
The policy change came after two deadly shootings involving ICE agents. 
An ICE agent shot and killed Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a 25-year-old Colombian national, in Maine on Monday, less than a week after an agent shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujoa, a Mexican national, on his way to work on July 7 in Houston. 
The suspension of vehicle stops allows room for exceptions when executing a criminal warrant or working with partner agencies, the Associated Press reports. 
Confirmation Bias
15.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
37.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
17.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
11.3%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
15.8%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
52.2%
Self-Serving Bias
11.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
15.8%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
19.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
14.8%
Primacy Effect
6.4%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
15.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
15.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
19.7%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
52.2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
28.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
8.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
8.4%
Biased Writer Voice
28.6%
Indoctrination
19.7%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

203 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.