MS NOW96%

Gov. Gavin Newsom says Justice Department is investigating him and his wife 49%

By Carol Leonnig0% Erum Salam77%

6/15/2026, 2:12:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 588 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of 49% (11,524 of 22,415 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the article peer group.

A federal prosecutor’s office based in Sacramento is investigating California Gov. 
Gavin Newsom’s wife for potential tax fraud and evasion, MS NOW has confirmed with two sources familiar with the probe. 
The probe stems back to early 2025, and is just one of several investigations that have encircled Newsom, his office and his family, the people said. 
The Justice Department’s public integrity section had been investigating for months potential crimes involving the tax filings of Newsom’s wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, and had teamed up with the U.S. attorney’s office in the Eastern District of California, based in Sacramento, the people said. 
The outspoken governor announced the probe Monday, accusing President Donald Trump of again using the agency to target his foes. 
“Today, my wife & I joined Donald Trump’s hit list. 
He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us,” Newsom said on X. 
“We have nothing to hide.” 
“Today, my wife & I joined Donald Trump’s hit list. 
He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us. .. 
We have nothing to hide.” 
Gov. 
Gavin Newsom 
Newsom’s wife has been interviewed in recent weeks by federal investigators as part of the inquiry, which is focused on evidence indicating her personal use of nonprofit funds, one of the people briefed on the probe said. 
Newsom, a likely candidate for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, said the Department of Justice has been trying to contact those close to him and uncover documents related to him. 
“In recent days, federal agents have knocked on the doors of family friends and former employees. 
Not because they found a crime. 
Because they are simply trying to find one,” Newsom said the a video message posted to his official website and X account, accusing Trump and his DOJ of “abusing the grand jury process.” 
“Donald Trump isn’t just coming after me because of my mean tweets. 
He’s coming after me because I’m considering running for president,” the two-term governor said. 
Other investigations have been eyeing Newsom and his operations, according to the sources. 
One person said Newsom’s chief of staff had been under investigative review in the Sacramento office. 
Additionally, the top political prosecutor in the Central District of California, Bill Essayli, had been pushing his prosecutors to investigate Newsom for months, that person said, but the status of that office’s work is unclear. 
“There have been several investigations in California involving Newsom and his wife, going on for more than a year,” said one person familiar with the California investigations. 
While Newsom said he is proud to join what he characterized as Trump’s “hit list” of political foes, he condemned what he called the targeting of his wife, whom Newsom described as “someone who has done nothing wrong, other than having the temerity to advocate for what she believes in.” 
“Donald Trump picked the wrong target,” Newsom said, adding that if investigators “really want to find corruption, look no further than 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.” 
Newsom did not describe the nature of the agents’ questions. 
Newsom’s former chief of staff, Dana Williamson, was arrested in November on federal charges of misusing public funds. 
She pleaded guilty last month to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and wire fraud, filing a false tax return and making false statements to a federal agent. 
The White House referred MS NOW’s request for comment to the Justice Department. 
Lisa Rubin contributed to this report. 
This is a developing story. 
Please check back for updates. 
Confirmation Bias
15.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
10.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
8%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
13.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
9.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
1%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
24.3%
Self-Serving Bias
15.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
8.5%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5.1%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
13.4%
False Dilemma
2%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
11.2%
Red Herring
4.1%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
9%
Begging the Question
5.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
8.2%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
30.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
2.7%
No True Scotsman
8.5%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
19.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
3.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
6.1%
Biased Writer Voice
9.7%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

588 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.