KQED61%

The Governor’s Race Changes Shape  Again 94%

By Ericka Cruz Guevarra0% Guy Marzorati75% Jessica Kariisa0% Alan Montecillo0%

4/22/2026, 10:00:25 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Recency Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 212 faulty-reasoning hits from 155 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 91% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,024 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the article peer group.

It’s been one week since Rep. 
Eric Swalwell ended his run for governor after multiple allegations of sexual assault and misconduct. 
Before that, he was starting to consolidate support from voters in the progressive, vote-rich Bay Area. 
Now that he’s out of the race, the remaining candidates  especially the leading Democrats  are trying to win over his supporters before the June 2 primary. 
Links: 
 How to watch the California governor’s debate on KRON4 and KRON4+ 
 The Rise and Fall of Eric Swallwell (The Bay) 
 Betty Yee Becomes Latest Democrat to Exit California Governor’s Race 
 With Swalwell Out, Who Will Bay Area Voters Support for California Governor? 
 California Governor Candidates Compete for Swalwell’s Endorsements, Donors and Voters 
Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco-Northern California Local. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
18.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
10.3%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
16.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
18.1%
Primacy Effect
7.1%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
8.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
7.1%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
18.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
9.7%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
23.9%

155 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.