KQED61%

Who Draws the Lines? A History of Gerrymandering0%

By Marisa Lagos91% Scott Shafer0%

12/27/2025, 12:05:40 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, In-Group Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 388 faulty-reasoning hits from 101 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Over the holidays, we’re rebroadcasting some of our favorite interviews from 2025. 
President Donald Trump this summer set off an unusual mid-decade redistricting scramble after he asked Republican-led states to redraw their congressional districts to give the GOP more seats in Congress. 
California Democrats responded with their own new map, which voters approved through Proposition 50 in November. 
Scott and Marisa discuss the history of gerrymandering with Los Angeles Times writer James Rainey, taking us back to an earlier era when it was a regular part of California’s political landscape. 
Check out Political Breakdown’s weekly newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox. 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
31.7%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
45.5%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
22.8%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
31.7%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
45.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
29.7%
Optimism Bias
22.8%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
31.7%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
0%
Appeal to Authority
47.5%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
15.8%
Begging the Question
29.7%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
29.7%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

101 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.