BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 65.8% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 277 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,512 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the article peer group.

L.A. 
Influential is the story of Los Angeles in 2024 
L.A. 
Influential presents people of all ages, backgrounds and fields, who are making a difference in a city that is in constant flux. 
The Creators: A Hollywood trailblazer, a gaming visionary, a horror genius... 
The Connectors: A story huntress, a new kind of cop, a food tastemaker... 
The Money: A Magic billionaire, Hollywood’s political bundler, agricultural barons... 
The Civic Center: A groundbreaking mayor, a housing advocate, a giver of food... 
The Disruptors: The Mattel miracle maker, the modern Babe Ruth, the street vendor avenger... 
The Establishment: Mother of Kardashians, the nation’s vice president, a live music overlord... 
Watch: L.A. 
Influential Up Close 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
12.3%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
17.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
19.3%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
20.2%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
42.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
19.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
23.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
65.8%
Indoctrination
8.8%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
4.4%

114 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.