Judge to Decide on New Trial for Former UCSB Student Convicted of Rape 7%

By Rebecca Caraway10%

8/1/2026, 7:55:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 266 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.6% and a BS Rank of 7% (24,158 of 25,983 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the article peer group.

Six months after a former UC Santa Barbara student was convicted of sexually assaulting two women and attempted to flee from Sheriff’s Office custody , a judge will decide if he gets a new trial on Thursday. 
Arian Eteghaei, 23, was convicted in January of sexual penetration with a foreign object and domestic-violence battery against an ex-girlfriend, identified in court as Jane Doe H.O.C.; and forcible rape against a woman identified as Jane Doe M.E. 
He also now faces a felony charge of escape by force or violence after he fled from the Figueroa Courthouse following his conviction. 
He has pleaded not guilty to the escape charge . 
Since his conviction, Eteghaei has retained new attorneys and is seeking a retrial. 
Judge Von Deroian will consider the motion on Thursday. 
Eteghaei’s mother, Mitra Zade, remains banned from the courthouse after she yelled at prosecutors and investigators from across the street, and accused the court of corruption following the guilty verdict. 
She will be allowed to watch the tentative sentencing hearing scheduled for Aug. 10 on Zoom, Deroian ruled earlier this week. 
Eteghaei, who was a freshman at UCSB in 2020-21, was arrested and criminally charged in August 2021 for alleged assaults on three women. 
During the investigation, three more women came forward and reported they had been assaulted by Eteghaei, according to authorities. 
Each alleged victim was identified anonymously as Jane Doe plus initials. 
Many of them testified against him in court during the trial . 
Eteghaei also testified in his own defense. 
Confirmation Bias
4.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
7.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
4.9%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
22.9%
Self-Serving Bias
2.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

266 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.