UNH’s new 3-year bachelor degrees will save some students $10K in tuition 6%

By Annmarie Timmins0%

7/30/2026, 2:16:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 238 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (21,219 of 22,405 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the article peer group.

The University of New Hampshire is making two bachelor degree programs cheaper and less time-consuming to complete for online students, who tend to be working or in the military while attending school. 
Beginning this fall, students in UNH’s College of Professional Studies will be able to complete degrees in management and computer information technology in as few as three years rather than four. 
That would save in-state and out-of-state students $10,350 in tuition. 
Plymouth State University introduced three-year degrees in 2024. 
Tamara Von George, associate vice provost for online learning at the University of New Hampshire, said the three-year degrees will benefit students and businesses. 
“We've aligned these [new degrees] with what our employers are telling us that students need to be successful in the workplace,” she said. 
The university reduced the number of required credits from 120 to 90 by eliminating some general education course requirements and focusing on classes that align with students’ career goals. 
“Our students have already done a lot of exploration. 
These are adult learners who've taken classes, who've worked, who've explored,” Von George said. 
“It's not for the student who is unsure of what they're looking for, wants to explore and wants to take a lot of electives.” 
The two degrees will be open to students from in and outside New Hampshire at a cost of $345 per credit hour. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
12.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
9.7%
False Dilemma
10.1%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
3.4%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

238 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.