Tens of millions of taxpayers may be owed IRS refunds from COVID-era 65%

By Eric Revell80%

5/1/2026, 7:50:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Loss Aversion, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 250 hits. Analysis detected 1,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 609 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.7% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,919 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the article peer group.

The IRS' taxpayer advocate issued a notice that tens of millions of American taxpayers may be entitled to refunds or reduced penalties and interest due to the postponement of filing deadlines during the COVID-19 emergency declaration. 
The National Taxpayer Advocate said in a post on Thursday that refunds or abatements may be available to tens of millions of taxpayers for penalties and interest that were assessed by the IRS during the 3.5-year COVID disaster declaration period. 
It explained that the issue has arisen due to recent court decisions, including a ruling in what's known as the Kwong case that the tax code's handling of federal disaster declarations meant that filing and payment deadlines were postponed throughout the period from Jan. 20, 2020, through May 11, 2023. 
The taxpayer advocate noted that the Justice Department may appeal the decision, but the relief compelled by the ruling isn't automatic and affected taxpayers must file their refund claims by July 10, 2026. 
MISSED THE APRIL 15 TAX DEADLINE? 
HERE'S WHAT EXPERTS SAY YOU SHOULD DO 
“Because of the infrequency of a disaster lasting this long, most taxpayers, even most tax professionals, did not foresee that filing deadlines and payments deadlines would be postponed for this long and that return filings and payments would not be considered late and therefore not subject to penalties and interest. 
But that is the logical extension of what the court ruled,” the National Taxpayer Advocate wrote. 
They went on to warn that barring further action by the IRS or Congress to make sure that all taxpayers impacted by the ruling get what they're owed, such taxpayers face a fast-approaching deadline to file their claims. 
AVERAGE TAX REFUND UP NEARLY 11% FROM A YEAR AGO, IRS DATA SHOWS 
“Unless the IRS or Congress acts to ensure all affected taxpayers will receive refunds if the Kwong decision is upheld, taxpayers seeking refunds for penalties and interest they paid relating to that period will, in most cases, need to file claims by July 10, 2026,” the advocate explained. 
“At the risk of repetition, my overriding goal is to get the word out to as many taxpayers as possible and to avoid disparate results between the 'well advised' and the unaware,'” they said. 
The taxpayer advocate said that affected taxpayers may be entitled to a refund or abatement of amounts assessed during the COVID period for: 
Penalties assessed for failure to file timely returns, failure to pay taxes, or failure to make estimated tax payments; 
Interest that began accruing earlier than it should have, or not at all; and 
Overpayment interest for the 2020-2023 disaster period. 
TAX REFUNDS ARE BIGGER THAN EVER THIS YEAR, BUT RESIDENTS OF 5 STATES ARE CASHING IN THE MOST 
The notice cautioned that the IRS requires claims under Form 843 to be filed through paper submissions, and because such filings may not provide an immediate confirmation of receipt, it advised that taxpayers should send claims by certified mail to have evidence of their timely submission in case the forms are lost. 
The taxpayer advocate recommended that the IRS should abide by the Taxpayer Bill of Rights and take four steps, including publicizing the issue for taxpayers, providing a six-month filing extension for refund claims, consider providing systemic relief so taxpayers don't have to file, and to create an electronic submission portal. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
It also urged tax professionals to inform clients about the issue, members of Congress to highlight the issue in communications with constituents, and for the media to report about it for the public's knowledge. 
Confirmation Bias
14.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
8.2%
Overconfidence Bias
2.6%
Framing Effect
41.1%
Loss Aversion
21.2%
Status Quo Bias
8.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
19.5%
Negativity Bias
12.5%
Self-Serving Bias
5.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
8.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
2.1%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
27.8%
False Dilemma
13.3%
Slippery Slope
6.2%
Circular Reasoning
2.6%
Hasty Generalization
11.2%
Red Herring
1.5%
Bandwagon
5.6%
Appeal to Emotion
9.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
6.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
2.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
8.2%
Quote-first Misdirection
1%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
15.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
1.5%

609 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.