Raw Story93%

Money will probably matter most for Trump's presidential pick: analyst 84%

By María Teresita Armstrong-Matta94%

7/21/2026, 1:00:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Burden of Proof, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 539 faulty-reasoning hits from 173 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,108 of 19,038 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump has signaled his preference for Don Jr. as the 2028 presidential successor over Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 
According to analyst Jonathan V. 
Last of The Bulwark, Trump Media & Technology Group's new Truth Social API product represents infrastructure building for family financial gain. 
It also gives subscribers early access to posts before public release. 
"But believe me: This story is fascinating," Last wrote. 
"It demonstrates Trump's animal cunning. 
And it points to yet another vulnerability in America's economic and social order. 
One that we hadn't even realized existed." 
Last argues Trump is systematically building wealth-generating infrastructure for his family's control of the Republican Party, and says, "Truth API is worth probably a few hundred million dollars a year if a Trump is president, or is presumed to have a 50-50 chance to be president." 
But, "It is worth zero dollars if Marco Rubio or JD Vance is president," he added. 
Watch the video below. 
Confirmation Bias
35.8%
Anchoring Bias
5.8%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
4%
Overconfidence Bias
32.4%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
7.5%
Negativity Bias
27.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
5.2%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.7%
False Dilemma
9.2%
Slippery Slope
7.5%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
26.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
2.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
35.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
12.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
2.9%
Quote-first Misdirection
5.2%
Biased Writer Voice
44.5%
Indoctrination
6.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
12.1%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
6.4%

173 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.