CBC50%

Gender and sex: Looking back on 100 years of 'the worst scientific research' 90%

By CBC Docs0%

3/27/2024, 4:22:32 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 460 faulty-reasoning hits from 183 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.2% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,761 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the article peer group.

Today, the mainstream scientific consensus is that gender and sexuality exist on a spectrum throughout nature, but that hasn't always been the view. 
In Fluid: Life Beyond the Binary, a documentary from The Nature of Things, historian Jules Gill-Peterson and host Mae Martin look back on several milestones in the flawed (but still influential) history of gender science. 
"We're looking at about a century's worth of some of the worst scientific research telling us what gender and sex really are," Gill-Peterson says. 
In the video above, Gill-Peterson talks about conversion therapy, the shaming of kids whose behaviour strayed from gender norms, and an inspiring act of social justice by gay psychiatrist John Fryer. 
"When we look at this whole span of history, part of what it reminds us is that it's not just that science was conducted incorrectly, but that it really took people stepping up and challenging the way that science was practised to make it finally change," she says. 
Watch Fluid: Life Beyond the Binary on CBC Gem. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
26.2%
Overconfidence Bias
13.1%
Framing Effect
16.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
12.6%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
39.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
12.6%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
13.1%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
7.1%
Indoctrination
26.2%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
43.2%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
41%

183 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.