RSS Terms of Service 47%

By Washington Post staff13%

1/1/2021, 4:14:15 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Loss Aversion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 64.1% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 491 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (10,093 of 18,898 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the article peer group.

We encourage new and innovative uses of our content, and we want our readers to have access to our content in a wide variety of different ways. 
We therefore make our content available through RSS feeds for personal use (e.g., in a news reader), for many commercial purposes, or for any other form of distribution to a third party. 
However, all use of our RSS feeds is subject to our User Agreement and to the terms and conditions below. 
If you have questions or concerns about any of these terms  or if you wish to use an RSS feed in a manner inconsistent with any provision below (e.g., on a mobile device for commercial purposes or redistribution, or with your own advertising)  please do not hesitate to contact us at rsssupport@washpost.com. 
We will be happy to discuss your ideas and to work with you to try to meet your requests. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
20.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
55.1%
Loss Aversion
34.6%
Status Quo Bias
12.8%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
29.5%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
12.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
17.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
64.1%
Indoctrination
12.8%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
55.1%

156 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.