BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 254 faulty-reasoning hits from 232 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.7% and a BS Rank of 50% (9,934 of 19,793 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the article peer group.

City Limits rounds up the latest housing and land use-related events and public hearings, plus affordable housing lotteries that are ending soon. 
“The problem is not merely terminology. 
It is the promotion of an unauthorized delivery method and, often, the suggestion that professional architectural services are included when the advertiser is not… 
NYCHA is moving ahead with plans to rehabilitate a unique cluster of Manhattan brownstones, many of which are afforded landmark protection status, by converting the apartments to private management. 
The federal government passed its first housing bill in decades, finally taking up some of the solutions already tested in New York City. 
But don’t expect a big impact on… 
After a nearly four-month stall, plans to demolish and rebuild 2,000 public housing apartments in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood are back on again. 
The city’s latest housing vs. parking battle is playing out at an East Village Mitchell-Lama co-op, where the board is considering the sale to raise money for their 60-year-old buildings. 
 
"New York City deserves parks that are cared for by skilled Parks workers whose expertise and labor cannot be replaced by volunteers." 
A fallen tree in Crocheron Park in Bayside,… 
New affordable housing is still concentrated in lower-income, high-density communities, while other areas see little to no development. 
“We’re not yet seeing more equal distribution,” said Brendan Cheney, director of… 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
7.8%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
9.5%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
9.9%
Pessimism Bias
8.2%
Negativity Bias
7.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
9.5%
False Dilemma
9.5%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
2.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
10.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
12.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
2.6%
Biased Writer Voice
10.3%
Indoctrination
9.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

232 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.