Originals Case Studies - LA Times Studios91%

5/31/2025, 4:32:31 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Bandwagon, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 130 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 85.6% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,588 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the article peer group.

CASE STUDIES 
We produce videos, podcasts, articles & custom events. 
VIDEO 
We produce award-winning films, documentaries, interview series, streaming and more, aimed at providing narrative storytelling, expert insights and individual perspectives for our broad and diverse local and global audience. 
Fernandomania @ 40 
The Randall Scandal: Love, Loathing & Vanderpump 
Alice Waters: How To Start A Food Revolution 
The Colorado River 
Innovators Unplugged 
Behind The Story 
Hollywood's Finest 
Los Angeles Times Short Docs 
AUDIO 
We produce award-winning non-fiction audio to tell more in-depth stories for our listeners, both local and worldwide. 
Dirty John 
Foretold 
Boiling Point 
Headlines From The Times 
Crimes Of The Times 
The Envelope 
EVENTS 
We produce original events for live audiences all over the world. 
Festival Of Books 
101 Best 
Food Bowl 
Los Angeles Times Book Club 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
44.6%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
23.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
8.5%
Optimism Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
14.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
35.4%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
0%
Appeal to Authority
41.5%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
35.4%
Begging the Question
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

130 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.