BREAKING: Cori Bush loses AGAIN to Wesley Bell in Missouri House race 56%

By Thomas Stevenson67%

8/4/2026, 6:19:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Straw Man, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 277 faulty-reasoning hits from 302 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47% and a BS Rank of 56% (12,121 of 27,322 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the article peer group.

Incumbent House Democrat Wesley Bell defeated former Rep. 
Cori Bush again on Tuesday in a primary rematch, with Bell clinching the nomination at around 9pm on election night. 
Bush ran again after losing her seat in the last go-around, only to lose again to the same opponent. 
Bell, who is more moderate and is more pro-Israel than Bush, clinched around 70 percent of the vote to Bush's 26 percent as of 9 pm eastern with 26 percent of the vote counted. 
Bell unseated Bush in 2024 after Bush’s rise as a progressive in Congress. 
Bush often voted with the far-left members of the House, known as the "Squad," which includes Reps. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, and others. 
Bush, who was backed by the Democratic Socialists of America in the race, had attacked Bell over his support from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). 
Bell's win is also a victory for the more establishment wing of the Democrat Party, as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and the Congressional Black Caucus PAC had endorsed Bell ahead of the election. 
Bell is expected to have a smooth-sailing victory in the general election in Missouri's 1st Congressional District, which is a deep blue stronghold. 
According to NBC News, Bell overwhelmed Bush on the airwaves and was able to outspend Bush by a ratio of 27 to 1. 
On Tuesday, when Bell cast his own vote, he slammed Bush for talking so much about Israel, saying that she would go on “over and over ... about an issue that is not impacting folks right here in St. 
Louis.” 
“And while we take those issues seriously, you know, the M in Missouri doesn’t stand for Middle East,” Bell added “It stands for Missouri.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 7.5%The Post Millennial: 6.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 4.0%The Post Millennial: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias7.6%This article: 15.2%Thomas Stevenson: 12.8%The Post Millennial: 10.3%Framing Effect15.2%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.6%The Post Millennial: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.4%The Post Millennial: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Thomas Stevenson: 12.5%The Post Millennial: 10.3%Negativity Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.9%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.5%The Post Millennial: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.4%The Post Millennial: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 2.0%Halo Effect11.3%This article: 5.6%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.5%Horn Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.4%The Post Millennial: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 12.9%Thomas Stevenson: 0.9%The Post Millennial: 1.2%Straw Man12.9%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 3.2%The Post Millennial: 2.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.9%Thomas Stevenson: 0.8%The Post Millennial: 1.6%False Dilemma7.9%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Thomas Stevenson: 6.1%The Post Millennial: 5.8%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 4.2%The Post Millennial: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.6%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.8%The Post Millennial: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.6%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.4%The Post Millennial: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.8%The Post Millennial: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.5%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 4.2%The Post Millennial: 5.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.1%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Thomas Stevenson: 8.0%The Post Millennial: 6.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

302 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker21%attributed speech238writer words
Selected voice

Wesley Bell

98%flagged-word coverage
64 attributed words100% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Politically Right Leaning -19.3 ptsWriter: 19.3%Wesley Bell: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.