Futurism88%

Trump Says Images of the Iranian Elementary School His Lackeys Obliterated Could Be “AI Generated” 67%

By Joe Wilkins84%

7/23/2026, 3:50:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 1,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.2% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,414 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the article peer group.

Over four months after the deadly US bombing of the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ school in Southern Iran, which killed 120 children and dozens of teachers and parents, questions still remain over how the horror unfolded. 
All available evidence suggests that the US military was behind the bloodbath. 
Images that show fragments of US Tomahawk missiles on the site, leaked commentary from military analysts, and operational profiles of the military forces involved in the region make a pretty air-tight case that the Pentagon bears responsibility for the horrific attacks. 
Adding to the mountain of evidence is a new in-depth analysis conducted by Sky News and the publication Forensic Architecture . 
Reconstructing the school as a 3D model, the team verified that the site had been a school for years prior to the attack, refuting the claim that old intel was they key factor behind the attack. 
US president Donald Trump isn’t satisfied with that answer. 
Speaking to Fox News anchor Trey Yingst, Trump avoided saying whether he would release the findings of the investigation, saying he still has to “speak to the generals.” 
“Y’know, I don’t think anybody’s ever going to be able to say what happened there,” Trump opined. 
“There are images from this site that show fragments that appear to be from US Tomahawk missiles,” Yingst gently prompts. 
“Is it possible that old intelligence, or a mistake from a very active time in the war lead to this event?” 
“It is,” Trump replied, “but it’s also possible that those images you have are AI generated. 
I know you’re waiting for a conclusive report but I don’t think there can be a conclusive report.” 
The dodge is a perfect illustration of the deleterious effects of AI on civic society: not only can peddlers of disinformation use the technology to fabricate evidence, but dishonest power players can point to the existence of AI to discount actual documentation of misbehavior or crimes. 
That Trump refuses to take responsibility for the consequences of his war on Iran is hardly shocking at this point, but the pressure is mounting. 
In a recent statement , national director of government relations and advocacy at Amnesty International Amanda Klasing wrote that the “public and the victims’ families must have transparency and accountability, and families must get truth, justice and reparations.” 
“President Trump has given contradictory statements, the Pentagon is stonewalling Congress, and lawmakers and the public are growing increasingly frustrated by the rote response of secretary Hegseth and others that the incident is still under investigation,” Klasing continued. 
“What we do know is this: the US military was responsible for killing over 150 people in an attack with precision-guided Tomahawk missiles on a school packed with children.” 
More on AI: SpaceX Eager to Support the Pentagon’s Lethal AI Models 
Confirmation Bias
16.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
8.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
18%
Framing Effect
13.8%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
7.3%
Negativity Bias
24.7%
Self-Serving Bias
5.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
5.2%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
8%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
26.6%
False Dilemma
4.4%
Slippery Slope
9.6%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
12.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
8%
Begging the Question
7.3%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
8.6%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
5.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
3.4%
Unattributed Quote
3.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
3.6%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
9.6%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
2.5%

477 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.