AP News53%

House passes bill to ‘ditch the switch’ and make daylight saving time permanent 41%

By KEVIN FREKING0%

7/14/2026, 9:45:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 685 faulty-reasoning hits from 475 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,892 of 16,550 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  There will be no turning back the clock if the House has its way. 
The House passed a bill Tuesday that would make daylight saving time permanent. 
Proponents, including the White House, argued the change would provide more daylight during the times that Americans are most active. 
The vote was 308-117. 
Daylight saving time is that period between spring and fall when clocks in most parts of the United States are set one hour ahead of standard time. 
States could opt out if their respective legislatures act to do so before the bill’s enactment. 
The Senate would also have to pass the bill before it could be signed into law, but it’s unclear if it will do so. 
Rep. 
Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla., said Americans are ready to “ditch the switch,” saying that changing the clock twice a year creates unnecessary disruption. 
More important, he said, it would give families more daylight time in the evening to spend outdoors and support local businesses. 
“In my home state of Florida where tourism is a cornerstone of our economy, having more predictable daylight hours is a practical improvement that benefits workers, businesses and visitors alike,” Bilirakis said. 
Detractors said permanent daylight saving time would lead to darker and potentially more hazardous winter mornings where children will be waiting for school buses and parents will be driving to work in darkness. 
Rep. 
Jim McGovern, D-Mass, said he supported the bill, but he questioned whether it was the best way for Congress to be spending its time. 
“For folks getting crushed by rent, groceries, utility bills and healthcare costs, is this really the best the majority can do?” 
McGovern said. 
“Is this really the most pressing issue before the American people at this moment?” 
A 2025 poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows that if forced to choose, most Americans would prefer to keep that extra hour of daylight in the evening. 
If they had to choose one option for the entire country to use, more than half of adults  56%  prefer making daylight saving time permanent, with less light in the morning and more light in the evening. 
About 4 in 10 prefer standard time, with more light in the morning and less in the evening. 
The White House weighed in before the House vote, calling the “Sunshine Protection Act” a popular, common-sense reform and saying advisers would recommend the president sign the bill if it reaches his desk. 
Members of Congress have long been interested in the potential benefits and costs of daylight saving time since it was first adopted as a wartime measure in 1942. 
The Senate passed a bill four years ago to make daylight saving time permanent, but it stalled in the House. 
Confirmation Bias
4.2%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
6.7%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
5.9%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
3.6%
Pessimism Bias
5.1%
Negativity Bias
11.4%
Self-Serving Bias
4.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
6.9%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
4.2%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
13.7%
False Dilemma
4.4%
Slippery Slope
6.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
6.7%
Appeal to Emotion
8.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
2.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
13.3%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
6.9%

475 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.