AP News52%
Blanche meets with Epstein accusers after demand from Republican senator crucial to confirmation 63%
By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER49% JOEY CAPPELLETTI57%
7/16/2026, 5:41:32 PM
Topics: Blanche Meets With Epstein Accusers, Attorney General Nomination, Republican Senators Support, Justice Department, Jeffrey Epstein, Survivors, Thom Tillis, Confirmation Hearing, Legal Proceedings, Prosecutions, Fbi Investigation
Keywords: Thom Tillis, Donald Trump, Todd Blanche, U S Department Of Justice, District Of Columbia, Congress, Blanche Epstein Victims Tillis Attorney General, Jeffrey Epstein, Legal Proceedings, Dani Bensky, Pam Bondi, U S Federal Bureau Of Investigation, Ghislaine Maxwell, United States House Of Representatives, John Cornyn, Sexual Assault, Government And Politics, Politics
BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 770 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58% and a BS Rank of 63% (6,490 of 17,189 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the article peer group.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met Thursday with accusers of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein following the demand by a Republican senator whose support is crucial to advancing his nomination to lead the Justice Department.
Blanche spent about an hour at Justice Department headquarters in Washington with the group of Epstein accusers, who have criticized the Trump administration’s handling of the disgraced financier’s investigation and a trove of files related to his sex trafficking case.
After the meeting, Blanche told reporters that he encouraged the accusers to come to the FBI with any information that could help investigators build cases against additional figures tied to Epstein.
But Blanche acknowledged he couldn’t assure them additional prosecutions could be brought.
The Justice Department has repeatedly said it will investigate further if new information surfaces, but the government doesn’t currently have evidence to support prosecutions against others in Epstein’s orbit.
“It wasn’t all cordial,” Blanche said of Thursday’s meeting.
“Because there’s something that they want that I don’t think I can give them, which is some form of justice.
And I want to be able to give justice in the form of prosecutions, and maybe we can do a prosecution at some point,” Blanche said.
But Blanche added, “I don’t know.”
One accuser, Dani Bensky, expressed frustration after the meeting, saying Blanche appeared to treat it as “a mere ‘check-the-box’ exercise intended to secure votes for his confirmation.”
“He danced around his wording, repeatedly interrupted us and could not commit to anything that would demonstrate good faith or begin to restore trust,” she said in an emailed statement.
She said Blanche offered “no credible plan to investigate and pursue accountability” beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein.
Blanche has pushed back on suggestions that the Justice Department has been dismissive of the Epstein’s accusers, saying officials have spoken with more than 30 representatives of the women over the course of their sweeping review of the files.
“The Department of Justice will always meet with victims or their representatives, and if those victims or their representatives have evidence that anybody committed a crime — whether it has to do with Jeffrey Epstein or anybody else — we will of course move forward and investigate and prosecute,” Blanche told reporters.
The meeting came hours after Republican Sen.
Thom Tillis said it needed to happen before Blanche could earn his vote.
Without Tillis’ support, Blanche’s nomination won’t make it through the Senate Judiciary Committee, which questioned Blanche for hours Wednesday about the Epstein files as well as the creation of a fund to compensate President Donald Trump’s allies, a tax immunity deal for the president and a slew of other issues.
Trump’s teleprompter operator on unpaid leave for alleged prediction market bets on Trump speeches
Another Republican, Sen.
John Cornyn, has also expressed concern over the fund and has said he remains undecided about his vote.
Tillis indicated during Blanche’s confirmation hearing Wednesday that he was leaning toward backing Blanche, who has been leading the department in an acting capacity since April.
But after lawmakers heard Bensky’s testimony, Tillis said he expected a meeting between victims and Blanche to occur before he’s “willing to vote out of this committee.”
Tillis later Thursday commended Blanche for holding the meeting, writing in a social media post, “I appreciate his willingness to directly engage and listen to them.”
After missteps by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi that enraged Trump’s base, Blanche as deputy attorney general oversaw a massive review and the release of millions of files related to the investigation into Epstein.
The case has captivated internet sleuths and conspiracy theorists for years, in part because of Epstein’s connections to other powerful individuals.
Blanche has also defended the department’s staggered release of the Epstein files, a process beset by problems, including redaction errors that left exposed nude photos showing the faces of potential victims.
Blanche said during his confirmation hearing Wednesday that he takes responsibility for mistakes that were made, but noted that department lawyers were given a “herculean task” to quickly review millions of files for release.
Blanche said department lawyers took pains to protect the women involved, and quickly fixed any errors that were found.
“I am sorry that in about 1% of the documents mistakes were made,” Blanche said Wednesday.
“But what I will say on top of that is we put tons of resources to rectifying those mistakes immediately, including pulling down documents within minutes of being informed that there were mistakes.”
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.