A Shark May Have Bit a Surfer at Moonstone Beach Yesterday 56%

By Dezmond Remington69%

7/20/2026, 2:52:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Status Quo Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 654 faulty-reasoning hits from 304 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of 56% (8,366 of 18,920 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the article peer group.

A shark may have bit a surfer over the weekend at Moonstone Beach, though authorities said it went officially unreported. 
It nibbled a wedge out of a foam board yesterday at around 10 a.m., a surfer who was nearby told the Outpost, its bite barely punching through the man’s wetsuit. 
The victim was rattled but uninjured. 
The other surfers in the lineup, somewhere around a half dozen of them, paddled back to shore and told other surfers getting ready on the beach to stay there. 
It was a 10-foot long juvenile great white, the surfer who spoke with us claimed, and he said the victim “fought” the shark, putting his board between him and it before paddling to shore. 
Incidents like these shouldn’t be called an “attack,” per the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 
Shark bites are an extraordinarily rare event, and it’s almost never because they’re hunting us; it’s usually because they’re “investigating unusual objects in their environment,” says the CDFW. 
(Like a surfboard.) 
CDFW spokesman Peter Tira told the Outpost that no one reported the incident to the sheriff’s office or to CDFW. 
Skipping that step is a mistake, he said; the agency keeps bite incident data going back to the ‘50s, and keeping the record complete helps other beach-goers be aware of any potential dangers. 
They also could have determined what kind of shark it was by scraping some DNA off of the board. 
“But we don’t have that opportunity if it’s not reported to us,” Tira said, “or another public safety entity like the police or sheriff’s office.” 
The Humboldt County Sheriff's Office did not respond to a request for comment. 
The victim couldn't be reached. 
(If that’s you, would you please consider contacting Dezmond Remington at dezmond@lostcoastoutpost.com?) 
Confirmation Bias
6.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
18.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
9.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
11.2%
Framing Effect
9.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
19.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
8.6%
Self-Serving Bias
11.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
1.6%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
31.9%
False Dilemma
8.2%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
15.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
10.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
21.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
11.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
1%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
6.3%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
3.6%
Indoctrination
5.3%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
3.9%

304 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.