'Payout Pot For Punks': Tillis Shoots Down Trump's Latest Slush Fund Push 62%

By Heather83%

8/1/2026, 3:29:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 1,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 475 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.3% and a BS Rank of 62% (9,920 of 26,004 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the article peer group.

Sen. 
Thom Tillis took Trump to task for trying to get his slush fund codified into law just a day after he declared it "dead." 
As MS Now's Jacob Soboroff explained in the clip above: 
SOBOROFF: So just a few hours ago, President Trump took to Truth Social to proclaim that his controversial so-called anti-weaponization fund is back on the table. 
This is what he wrote in part: 
If Senators Cornyn and Tillis, both upset because I wouldn't endorse them, they lost and quit respectively, aren't going to approve Todd Blanche, then I will keep Todd as acting AG and push hard to get the anti-weaponization bill PASSED! 
Todd Blanche was a voice of reason. 
It will immediately be back on the table and I will get it done. 
OK, let's back up a little bit. 
This anti-weaponization fund essentially amounts to a slush fund that would funnel money to Trump allies who say they have been wronged by the Justice Department. 
And that could include January 6th rioters. 
Trump's fixation on this slush fund, which a judge has already ruled void, by the way, is standing in the way of Todd Blanche becoming the next attorney general, becoming confirmed. 
Two key Republican senators, John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, are withholding support for Todd Blanch over concerns about this exact thing, the anti-weaponization fund, among other issues. 
And Todd Blanche has verbally said the fund is dead. 
But Cornyn and Tillis want it in writing. 
And it seems for good reason, because Donald Trump is once again contradicting Todd Blanche's statement and his own past statements about the fund. 
Sen. 
Tillis quickly took to X to respond to Trump: 
Despite comments as late as yesterday that the fund is dead, President Trump clearly intends to resurrect the payout pot for punks either by inappropriately establishing another bogus fund or pushing Congress to vote for a bill that the majority of Republicans in the Senate would… https://t.co/OSoFTAKUkE 
 Senator Thom Tillis (@SenThomTillis) August 1, 2026 
The Senate Judiciary is scheduled to vote on Blanche on Tuesday, but there's still no deal: 
Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley rescheduled a planned vote on Todd Blanche’s nomination as attorney general late Friday in a preemptive move as negotiations between the Trump administration and GOP holdouts continue. 
The vote, now set for Tuesday after a scheduled Thursday vote was postponed, isn’t an indication that a deal allowing for Blanche’s confirmation is near, so much as it is a nod to Judiciary Committee rules that require three days of notice for a panel meeting. 
There is no sign that President Donald Trump is about to acquiesce to the unflinching demands of Sen. 
John Cornyn (R-Texas), who wants a controversial settlement agreement between Trump and the IRS substantially pared back. 
Confirmation Bias
29.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
13.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
9.7%
Pessimism Bias
20.2%
Negativity Bias
33.3%
Self-Serving Bias
8.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
5.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
1.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
9.9%
Primacy Effect
6.7%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
9.9%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
18.3%
Slippery Slope
9.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
2.5%
Begging the Question
8.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
6.5%
Tu Quoque
5.1%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
1.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
15.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
12.2%
Quote-first Misdirection
5.5%
Biased Writer Voice
24.4%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

475 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.