FOLLOWUP: SW Barton repaving is done early. So why won’t buses use it for seven more months? 7%

8/6/2026, 9:31:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 44.7% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 321 faulty-reasoning hits from 161 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.9% and a BS Rank of 7% (28,199 of 30,021 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the article peer group.

As we noted yesterday, Metro’s next "service change" is coming up in late August  a time when adjustments are made to bus routes. 
But even though the SW Barton repaving work is done  early  in the bus layover zone by Roxhill Park, SDOT says buses won’t be using it for another seven months, longer than it was under construction. 
From the latest SDOT update: 
Because construction finished earlier than planned, King County Metro (KCM) was not able to approve the bus service switch in time for the Fall Bus Service Change (which begins August 29). 
Metro plans to resume permanent bus service and reopen the layover zone in March 2027, restoring the previous stops on SW Barton. 
We’re doublechecking that with Metro, which had told us earlier this week that no date was set for restoring bus service to Barton, yet. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 44.7%West Seattle Blog: 1.1%Confirmation Bias44.7%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%West Seattle Blog: 5.0%Framing Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%West Seattle Blog: 0.8%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.7%West Seattle Blog: 2.2%Optimism Bias13.7%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 25.5%West Seattle Blog: 2.0%Negativity Bias25.5%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 34.2%West Seattle Blog: 1.7%Recency Bias34.2%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.6%West Seattle Blog: 1.0%Appeal to Authority23.6%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 6.2%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 19.3%West Seattle Blog: 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.3%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 23.6%West Seattle Blog: 1.7%Unattributed Quote23.6%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

161 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker24%attributed speech123writer words
Selected voice

SDOT

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words100% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%SDOT: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.