Today In Republicans Being Useless: Murkowski Tries (But Fails) To Sink Blanche Confirmation 87%

By Shawn Fleetwood82%

8/7/2026, 9:40:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 70.3% saturation with 417 hits. Analysis detected 2,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 593 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,156 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the article peer group.

The competition to see who the most shallow, feckless Republican in the U.S. 
Senate can be tight. 
But somehow, Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski always finds a way to come out on top. 
The Last Frontier State’s senior senator announced on Friday that she will be joining her pal Sen. 
Susan Collins, R-Maine, in opposing Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination. 
In typical Murkowski fashion, her reasons ranged from utter incoherence to outright dishonesty. 
In one breath, she praises Blanche as someone who “comes across as decent and capable. 
” Then, in the very next, she insinuates that he would abandon those attributes by going back on his decision to rescind the now-defunct anti-weaponization fund after his Senate confirmation. 
Perhaps the most egregious part of Murkowski’s diatribe, however, is the part in which she laughably claims that the “politicization” and “even weaponization” of the Justice Department “did not start with this administration *but has accelerated during it*” (emphasis added). 
Put another way, the mentally deficient queen of the North believes that acquiring justice and accountability for the DOJ's past abusers is equivalent to the weaponization those same abusers undertook in their jihad against Donald Trump and Republicans. 
It's total and complete nonsense. 
Fortunately for Blanche, a last-minute voice of support from outgoing Sen. 
Bill Cassidy, R-La., seems to give him enough votes to be confirmed to the position full-time. 
But for Murkowski, the incident shows yet again how she is nothing more than another Republican In Name Only (RINO) with a personal ax to grind. 
Consider, for instance, that the Alaska senator had no problem voting for Merrick Garland's attorney general nomination. 
The Biden-appointed Garland would go on to weaponize the DOJ like no AG before him. 
Under his tenure, the department attempted to imprison Trump ahead of the 2024 election, 2020 election protestors, pro-lifers, and other faithful Christians; spied on several of Murkowski's GOP colleagues; and targeted parents protesting unscientific Covid restrictions and racial indoctrination at school board meetings. 
Murkowski also notably voted for Antony Blinken as secretary of state; Pete Buttigieg as transportation secretary; Miguel Cardona as education secretary; and Janet Yellen as treasury secretary. 
Much like Garland, these appointees come with their own laundry list of scandals and destructive policy agendas, as The Federalist previously reported. 
When it comes to judicial nominations, Murkowski infamously caved to the left's despicable propaganda campaign against Brett Kavanaugh by declining to support his Supreme Court confirmation. 
Meanwhile, she was one of the few Republican senators to side with Democrats in backing Ketanji Brown Jackson's confirmation to the high court a few years later. 
On the policy front, Murkowski has often aligned with her radical Democrat colleagues to oppose efforts backed by her constituents and other GOP voters. 
Since Trump's return to office, she's opposed the SAVE America Act; helped Democrats kill a bill amendment stopping taxpayer dollars from going to Planned Parenthood; attacked the administration's deportation agenda; and attempted to salvage Biden-era "green" energy bailouts, to name a few. 
Murkowski is not a "principled" lawmaker in the slightest. 
She's a self-interested political opportunist who loathes the Republican base and the president, loves the spotlight, and who only won reelection because her allies changed Alaska's election system to her benefit. 
This leaves Alaska voters with a choice to make: They can either send her into much-deserved retirement in 2028, or continue to be represented by someone who hates their guts and everything they believe in. 
By every measure, it's not a hard one to make. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.1%Shawn Fleetwood: 6.7%The Federalist: 8.4%Confirmation Bias19.1%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.5%The Federalist: 3.3%Availability Heuristic9.6%This article: 6.2%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.9%The Federalist: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.2%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.8%The Federalist: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 2.2%Shawn Fleetwood: 10.6%The Federalist: 10.0%Framing Effect2.2%This article: 7.6%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion7.6%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.2%The Federalist: 1.6%Pessimism Bias2.5%This article: 46.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 11.5%The Federalist: 11.5%Negativity Bias46.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.1%The Federalist: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error14.7%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 3.0%The Federalist: 3.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.9%The Federalist: 2.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 3.9%The Federalist: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.8%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.5%The Federalist: 1.1%Recency Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 22.6%Shawn Fleetwood: 4.5%The Federalist: 5.0%Ad Hominem22.6%This article: 4.4%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.3%The Federalist: 2.7%Straw Man4.4%This article: 3.7%Shawn Fleetwood: 4.1%The Federalist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 7.6%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.7%The Federalist: 2.6%False Dilemma7.6%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.1%The Federalist: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.5%Shawn Fleetwood: 7.5%The Federalist: 10.8%Hasty Generalization13.5%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.6%Shawn Fleetwood: 7.7%The Federalist: 8.0%Appeal to Emotion11.6%This article: 8.8%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.7%The Federalist: 2.7%Begging the Question8.8%This article: 2.5%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.2%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.1%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.9%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.3%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.2%The Federalist: 2.7%Anecdotal14.3%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.1%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.3%The Federalist: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.1%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 6.7%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity6.7%This article: 5.2%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading5.2%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.9%The Federalist: 2.8%Unattributed Quote2.5%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.9%The Federalist: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 70.3%Shawn Fleetwood: 18.6%The Federalist: 18.8%Biased Writer Voice70.3%This article: 12.8%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.0%The Federalist: 4.7%Indoctrination12.8%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 24.1%Shawn Fleetwood: 15.5%The Federalist: 15.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias24.1%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.3%The Federalist: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

593 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers17%attributed speech492writer words
Selected voice

Lisa Murkowski

100%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words84% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice+11.8 ptsWriter: 70.5%Lisa Murkowski: 82.4%82.4%Politically Right Leaning -29.1 ptsWriter: 29.1%Lisa Murkowski: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+17.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lisa Murkowski: 17.6%17.6%Indoctrination-15.4 ptsWriter: 15.4%Lisa Murkowski: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.