BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Recency Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 196 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (22,579 of 26,003 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the article peer group.

It's that time again! 
"Mad Money" host Jim Cramer rings the lightning round bell, which means he's giving his answers to callers' stock questions at rapid speed. 
Forgent Power Solutions: "I would tell you that this company is not cheap, but I think that the stock is right versus the others that are in the group." 
NVE Corp: "I don't want to be glib about this. 
I need to know better. 
I need to know this company more because it just moved up so much." 
Summit Therapeutics: "It's a great spec. 
This can be your spec." 
Carvana: "It is a buying opportunity. ... 
This was a good quarter." 
Reddit: "I'm not a seller of Reddit here. 
I was surprised that the stock got hit as bad as it did. 
It should not have done so." 
Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer's every move in the market. 
Disclaimer 
Questions for Cramer? 
Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC 
Want to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? 
Hit him up! 
Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - Instagram 
Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? 
madcap@cnbc.com 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
14.8%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
6.6%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
3.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
7.1%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
8.7%

196 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.