Federal government to wipe out student loans of 170,000 more defrauded borrowers 24%

By Stacy Cowley22%

8/3/2026, 5:33:40 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 616 faulty-reasoning hits from 407 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.1% and a BS Rank of 24% (20,757 of 27,321 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the article peer group.

More than 170,000 federal student loan borrowers who said they were defrauded by their schools are set to have $11 billion in debt erased, after an appellate court sided with the borrowers and rejected a request from the Education Department for more time to review their claims. 
The decision is the latest grant of mass relief in a class-action suit that was originally filed during President Donald Trump’s first term. 
The suit centered on federal loans taken out by students who attended dozens of predatory for-profit schools. 
The government settled the case in 2022, under former President Joe Biden, and forgave the student loan debts of nearly 300,000 borrowers who had become plaintiffs in the class action. 
But the settlement required the government to keep reviewing fraud claims from borrowers who filed after the 2022 deal was announced. 
The agreement set a deadline of early 2026: If the Education Department had not adjudicated the additional claims by then, they were to be automatically approved. 
In late 2025, the Trump administration asked for an additional 18 months to review the cases. 
A federal district judge rejected the request, and last month, a panel of three judges from the 9th U.S. 
Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld his decision. 
The total size of the class-action settlement has now expanded to nearly 500,000 borrowers, who will have debts totaling $23 billion wiped out. 
That makes it -- by a substantial margin -- the largest class-action settlement in American history, according to the Project on Predatory Student Lending, the nonprofit group that represented the borrowers. 
It is also, by their calculation, the largest financial settlement against the federal government. 
Eileen Connor, the executive director of the nonprofit group, said she saw parallels between this case and the 1998 settlement that required tobacco companies to pay states more than $200 billion to settle dozens of lawsuits over the healthcare costs of treating smoking-related illnesses. 
“Tobacco is a toxic product -- and a lot of times, these schools are peddling these loans, and they turn out to be toxic,” she said. 
An Education Department spokesperson, Ellen Keast, said the original settlement “imposed an unrealistic deadline” on the department. 
“The Department has complied in good faith with court orders,” she said, “and we believe the court erred in not granting our reasonable request.” 
This article originally appeared in The New York Times. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.5%Stacy Cowley: 2.9%Boston Globe: 2.4%Confirmation Bias11.5%This article: 6.4%Stacy Cowley: 1.6%Boston Globe: 0.7%Anchoring Bias6.4%This article: 19.2%Stacy Cowley: 4.8%Boston Globe: 2.7%Availability Heuristic19.2%This article: 15.0%Stacy Cowley: 3.7%Boston Globe: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic15.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Stacy Cowley: 0.9%Boston Globe: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias3.4%This article: 5.7%Stacy Cowley: 1.4%Boston Globe: 4.0%Framing Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.2%Stacy Cowley: 1.3%Boston Globe: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Stacy Cowley: 2.8%Boston Globe: 6.9%Negativity Bias11.1%This article: 5.9%Stacy Cowley: 4.0%Boston Globe: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.7%Stacy Cowley: 1.4%Boston Globe: 1.1%Recency Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.0%Stacy Cowley: 2.4%Boston Globe: 3.0%Appeal to Authority2.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%Stacy Cowley: 4.2%Boston Globe: 2.2%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.0%Stacy Cowley: 7.8%Boston Globe: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion14.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.8%Stacy Cowley: 2.7%Boston Globe: 1.7%Anecdotal10.8%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.9%Stacy Cowley: 1.5%Boston Globe: 0.1%Special Pleading5.9%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.4%Stacy Cowley: 1.6%Boston Globe: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection6.4%This article: 11.5%Stacy Cowley: 2.9%Boston Globe: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice11.5%This article: 7.6%Stacy Cowley: 1.9%Boston Globe: 0.6%Indoctrination7.6%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stacy Cowley: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

407 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers35%attributed speech265writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words22% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Project on Predatory Student Lending: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.7 ptsWriter: 17.7%Project on Predatory Student Lending: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.