Trump: This Fund Isn't For Me, It's For The People Obama And Biden 'Destroyed' 80%

By Conover Kennard88%

8/1/2026, 5:22:24 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 64% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 372 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,226 of 26,004 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the article peer group.

Donald J. 
Trump is once again pushing the assertion that he and his allies were unfairly targeted by the Justice Department under Presidents Obama and Biden  and this time, he's arguing that no group of people, "most likely," has ever been treated worse. 
Sure thing, buddy. 
Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6th to stop the peaceful transition of power at his direction. 
We've seen it on video. 
But he knows the gullibility of his base. 
His supporters spread feces on the walls of the Capitol, but Trump will blame Biden and/or Obama for that, too. 
"I'm talking about weaponization against large numbers of people in our country by the Biden administration and by Obama, but by the Biden administration in particular in this case," Trump said. 
"But large numbers of people, their lives have been ruined. 
They've been destroyed. 
Their families have been, you know, decimated. 
They've gone to prison for no reason whatsoever." 
After that came the comparison: "There's never been a group of people, most likely, I mean, I can think of a couple that was treated pretty badly, groups, but there's essentially never been a group of people treated so badly as these people." 
Trump added that a fund set up in connection with all this "was not for me"  it was, he claimed, for the people who have supposedly suffered this unprecedented mistreatment. 
It's a remarkable claim on its face  that a group of Trump allies who ran afoul of federal investigators ranks among the most persecuted in history  and one that Trump delivered with his characteristic hedge ("most likely," "I can think of a couple") before doubling down anyway. 
Look at this crybaby: 
This follows Trump's fit on Truth Social where he appeared to be scripting an exit strategy for Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, a nominee he can't actually get confirmed. 
A DOJ order signed by Blanche barred the IRS from auditing Trump (a notorious tax cheat), his family, and his businesses for past tax returns. 
That didn't play out well with a judge, though. 
So, when he said it's not about him, unsurprisingly, he lied. 
Confirmation Bias
29.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
8.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
11.6%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
11.6%
Framing Effect
12.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
3%
Negativity Bias
26.1%
Self-Serving Bias
31.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
7.8%
In-Group Bias
2.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
21%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
2.2%
Ad Hominem
12.4%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
6.7%
False Dilemma
2.2%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
27.4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
5.9%
Begging the Question
13.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
7.8%
Tu Quoque
5.4%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
4.8%
No True Scotsman
11.6%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
23.9%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
11.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.8%
Biased Writer Voice
64%
Indoctrination
5.4%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
6.7%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

372 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.