9to5Mac75%

Report: Apple hit a record 49% share of global smartphone revenue for Q2 54%

By Marcus Mendes46%

7/31/2026, 11:19:52 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 961 faulty-reasoning hits from 435 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (11,839 of 25,473 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the article peer group.

According to Counterpoint Research, Apple captured nearly half of global smartphone revenue during the second quarter, despite a market-wide decline in shipments. 
Here are the details. 
Apple hits record revenue share for a second quarter 
A new report from Counterpoint Research (via MacMagazine) says Apple captured a record 49% of global smartphone revenue during the last quarter, as its revenue rose 22% year over year. 
That marked the company’s highest-ever revenue share for a second quarter. 
Counterpoint says total smartphone revenue grew 7% year over year during the quarter, with Apple recording the fastest growth among the five largest brands. 
Its average selling price rose to $946, up from $879 a year earlier. 
Apple also reached its highest-ever shipment share for a second quarter, rising to 21% from 17% a year earlier. 
Even so, the company remained in second place behind Samsung, which captured 23% of global shipments. 
The remaining brands in the top five all saw their shipment shares decline, with Xiaomi posting the steepest drop, from 14% to 11%. 
Its unit shipments fell 26% year over year. 
As Counterpoint noted, the market-wide memory shortage forced several smartphone manufacturers to raise prices as component costs increased and supplies tightened. 
Apple, meanwhile, kept iPhone pricing largely stable, although Counterpoint expects that to change in the coming quarters. 
From the report: 
Apple’s growth was led by the sustained demand for the iPhone 17 lineup, particularly the base iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro Max, which kept the brand’s mix skewed toward premium. 
Unlike peers that pushed through steep price increases, Apple kept pricing largely stable, reflecting its ability to absorb rising BOM costs and remain insulated from the memory crisis. 
However, Apple will likely increase prices in the coming quarters. 
This discipline strengthened Apple’s competitive position, enabling growth in both value and volume even as much of the market contracted. 
Regionally, China, Europe and emerging markets were the standout performers, as stable pricing improved Apple’s relative value proposition amid widespread Android price increases. 
Counterpoint’s report came on the heels of Apple’s fiscal Q3 2026 earnings call, during which the company warned that supply constraints would increase significantly in the September quarter, particularly for the iPhone, iPad, and Mac. 
To read Counterpoint’s full report, Worth checking out on Amazon 
Wireless CarPlay adapter. 
Geoffrey Cain  ‘Steve Jobs in Exile’ 
David Pogue  ’Apple: The First 50 Years’ 
MacBook Neo 
Logitech MX Master 4 
AirPods Pro 3 
AirTag (2nd Generation)  4 Pack 
Apple Watch Series 11 
Worth checking out on Amazon 
Wireless CarPlay adapter 
Confirmation Bias
12%
Anchoring Bias
9.9%
Availability Heuristic
7.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
16.1%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
9.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
6.4%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
4.6%
Pessimism Bias
6.2%
Negativity Bias
12%
Self-Serving Bias
10.1%
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.4%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
14%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
10.3%
Primacy Effect
5.1%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
14.9%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
2.3%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
11%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
17.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
10.6%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
6.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
5.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
3%
Biased Writer Voice
5.1%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
9.2%

435 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.