MKE County: Technical Glitch Delays Sheriff’s First Online Foreclosure Auction 33%

By Graham Kilmer36%

7/31/2026, 3:11:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 725 faulty-reasoning hits from 429 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (17,584 of 26,004 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the article peer group.

Vacant home slated for redevelopment by Gorman & Co. that the city previously owned through property tax foreclosure. 
Located at 2628 N. 21st. 
Photo by Jeramey Jannene. 
A technical glitch is pushing back the date of the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office ‘s (MCSO) first online foreclosure auction. 
The MCSO was all set to hold its first digital auction of property tax-foreclosed real estate on Aug. 
3. 
The new online auction would solve a long-running problem with rigged bids, collusion and intimidation during sheriff’s auctions. 
But “unforeseen technical complications” will delay the auction to Aug. 10, when the issues should be resolved. 
It has taken nearly a decade for the county to set up online foreclosure auctions. 
In 2018, the Milwaukee County Board pushed the MCSO and then-County Executive Chris Abele to set up an online auction system. 
The push followed changes in state law that allowed online auctions and also allowed the sheriff to reject potential bidders if they were known problem landlords with back taxes or excessive building code violations. 
Until now, the auctions have taken place in person in the basement of the Safety Building, 821 W State St. 
In the past year, the MCSO has worked with Bid4Assets, a digital real estate auction company, to host the sales for the sheriff’s office. 
It will “modernize” the process and provide “efficiency” for the government program and public bidders, according to the MCSO. 
It will also solve another problem. 
In 2023, then-county Corporation Counsel Margaret Daun explained that the foreclosure auction process has “extensive problems with both intimidation, collusion and other, what I would call negative behaviors, related to foreclosure sales… It is generally considered when you look at foreclosure sales, that moving them online does increase the fairness of the process and reduces the ability for effectively  and I’m going to be pretty blunt here, use some layperson language  bad actor landlords to overwhelm the process and dominate it.” 
Then-supervisor Eddie Cullen , now the communications manager in the Office of the County Clerk, authored the 2018 resolution pushing for an online system. 
The in-person auctions could be “scary” and were “very much an insider’s club of landlords who say, ‘Yeah, don’t bid on this one. 
I’ve got this one. 
We’ll let you get the next one,'” he told Urban Milwaukee in 2023. 
The new online program was set up using $277,980 in federal American Rescue Plan Act funds. 
The funding was allocated in 2023 as part of a $7 million countywide digital transformation project. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
4.7%
Availability Heuristic
6.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
4.7%
Sunk Cost Effect
3.7%
Optimism Bias
4.2%
Pessimism Bias
4%
Negativity Bias
24.7%
Self-Serving Bias
19.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
5.4%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
4.4%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
23.8%
False Dilemma
4.2%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
4.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
8.4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
5.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
3%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
19.3%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
4.4%

429 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.