Bronx man arrested for stabbing, slashing 3 men in Times Square 8%

By Emma Seiwell50%

7/22/2026, 4:17:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 172 faulty-reasoning hits from 144 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.8% and a BS Rank of 8% (20,151 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the article peer group.

A Bronx man was arrested for stabbing one man and slashing two others in Times Square, cops said Wednesday. 
Breshan Bennett, 24, was charged with assault, menacing, and criminal possession of a weapon for the Tuesday night clash on W. 50th St. near Seventh Ave., cops said. 
Bennett was bickering with the men across the street from an Applebee’s when he pulled a knife about 10:35 p.m., cops said. 
He allegedly stabbed a 24-year-old man in the torso and slashed him in the leg, slashed a 26-year-old man on both his hands and one leg, and slashed a third unidentified man in the leg. 
The wounded men were taken by medics to Bellevue Hospital in stable condition. 
It’s not clear what sparked the argument. 
Bennett’s arraignment in Manhattan Criminal Court was pending Wednesday. 
Confirmation Bias
13.2%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
15.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
7.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
9%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
45.1%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
4.9%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
24.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

144 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.