Colossal Biosciences reportedly in talks to raise new capital at $20B–$30B valuation 83%

By Marina Temkin64%

7/20/2026, 11:39:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 948 faulty-reasoning hits from 377 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,344 of 18,899 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the article peer group.

When de-extinction startup Colossal Biosciences revealed last year that it was attempting to “resurrect” the dire wolf from genetic material found in fossils, we argued that, despite the controversy surrounding the project, the company was building valuable technologies that justify its $10.2 billion valuation. 
Now, roughly 16 months later, the startup is in talks to raise new funding at a $20 billion to $30 billion valuation, Axios reported. 
It’s not clear who is leading the new round, or how much capital the five-year-old company is looking to raise. 
But we do know, according to the report, that Colossal has started generating revenue over the last year. 
Colossal co-founder and CEO Ben Lamm told TechCrunch last year that the company sees three revenue streams for the business. 
The company has offered its conservation technology to the U.S. government and the UAE, which recently invested $60 million in the company, according to Wired. 
Colossal has spun out three startups, including Breaking, a company that helps break down plastics; Form Bio, a computational biology platform secured $30 million in funding; and Astromech, an AI-driven predictive modeling company focused on biology and life sciences, which was valued at $2 billion in March. 
The company, which operates out a 55,000-square-foot headquarters in Dallas, keeps finding new applications for its core science, too. 
In late April, it added the bluebuck antelope as its sixth target species, while late last month, its nonprofit conservation arm, the Colossal Foundation, struck a University of Tasmania partnership to help protect Tasmanian devils from a contagious facial cancer. 
Lamm told TechCrunch last year that the company also plans to spin off its artificial animal womb technology, which could have applications for human fertility treatment. 
In May, he told Rolling Stone that the technology is expected to be ready next year. 
If the company manages to reintroduce extinct animals, including the woolly mammoth and the dodo bird, to their native habitats, it may eventually generate revenue through the sale of biodiversity credits, a market-based mechanism similar to carbon credits, according to Lamm. 
The new fundraising effort comes amid a boom in longevity tech, alternative energy, and other deep-tech sectors. 
Colossal didn’t respond to our request for comment. 
Confirmation Bias
11.7%
Anchoring Bias
9.5%
Availability Heuristic
11.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
12.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
5%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
27.1%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
4.8%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
30.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
21.2%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
23.6%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
10.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
10.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
4.5%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
10.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
12.5%
Anecdotal
4.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
12.2%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
16.4%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
6.4%

377 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.