Crypto Critic Maxine Waters’s New Primary Foe Got Over Two-Thirds of Money From Crypto 84%

By Matt Sledge67%

4/18/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 1,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 601 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,758 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the article peer group.

Rep. 
Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is the scourge of cryptocurrencies on Capitol Hill, burnishing her bona fides by supporting tighter oversight from her perch as ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee. 
If Democrats win the midterm elections, Waters is poised to become the chair of the influential committee. 
Crypto donors are trying to make sure that never happens. 
The woman mounting a long-shot challenge to Waters in California’s 43rd Congressional District has drawn more than two-thirds of her donations from the cryptocurrency industry. 
Nonprofit executive Myla Rahman, who is running as a younger alternative to the 87-year-old Waters, has taken 69 percent of her campaign contributions from crypto figures. 
Rahman’s biggest single donor is Ripple Labs CEO Brad Garlinghouse, a leading voice pushing for looser regulations on crypto who has been active in the debate over pending crypto legislation in Congress. 
Garlinghouse’s $6,600 donation last month helped bring Rahman’s total haul to $14,540 since announcing her long-shot campaign in February. 
The total haul is a pittance compared to what it would take to mount a viable campaign against Waters, a legendary figure who is serving her 18th term in the House. 
California’s primary election takes place on June 2. 
(Ripple Labs declined to comment.) 
The total haul is a pittance compared to what it would take to mount a viable campaign against Waters, a legendary figure. 
Still, any opposition funding could serve as a nuisance to Waters, a relative lightweight when it comes to fundraising compared to other top names in Congress. 
(Neither Waters’s nor Rahman’s campaigns responded to requests for comment.) 
Rahman’s second biggest benefactor was Colin McLaren, the head of government relations at the crypto advocacy nonprofit Solana Policy Institute. 
He chipped in $3,500. 
The crypto industry has ample reason to target Waters. 
While other Democrats have proven more accommodating, Waters has supported tighter oversight from her powerful position in the House Financial Services Committee, which has jurisdiction over the crypto industry. 
With Waters potentially assuming the helm of the committee next year, crypto is racing to win passage of a favorable regulatory framework in the form of a bill called the Clarity Act. 
Despite widespread support among the Republicans, the industry has faced intense pushback from banks and credit unions who worry that passage of the law could lead to a stampede of deposits out of their institutions and into crypto exchanges. 
Ripple, which has an estimated valuation of $50 billion, fought a yearslong legal battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission that centered on the issues under debate in Congress right now. 
Waters’s most recent campaign filing on April 15 showed that she had a little over $300,000 on hand. 
Many recent contributions came from the banks and credit unions squaring off against crypto on Capitol Hill. 
Despite her stance on crypto regulation, Waters also received a campaign donation from Ripple Labs co-founder and Democratic megadonor Chris Larsen. 
He gave $3,300 to Waters on March 6, only a few days after Garlinghouse made his donation to Rahman. 
Larsen gave one of the crypto industry’s highest-profile contributions to Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign. 
Rahman’s campaign does not mark crypto’s first quixotic campaign against a prominent congressional industry critic. 
The crypto industry also funded a Republican challenger in 2024 in an attempt to unseat Democratic Sen. 
Elizabeth Warren in deep-blue Massachusetts and a since-suspended primary challenge to Democratic California Rep. 
Brad Sherman. 
In Sherman’s race, the crypto industry made clear its intention to leverage a message of generational change against critics of blockchain currencies. 
Confirmation Bias
9.7%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
5.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
8.5%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
11.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
4.8%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.2%
Pessimism Bias
1.7%
Negativity Bias
23.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
3.5%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
2.8%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
3.3%
Halo Effect
16.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.2%
Primacy Effect
5.2%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
5.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
5.3%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
17.8%
Begging the Question
5.2%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
16%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
11.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
10.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
20.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
40.4%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

601 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.