BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 415 faulty-reasoning hits from 189 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (4,339 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the article peer group.

On the eve of Netflix shoveling a fourish-hour chunk of Stranger Things onto Christmas Day, we visit the past, present, and future of binge-dropped television shows. 
The strategy of releasing an entire season at the same time has been key to taking Netflix from a little startup that used to lend us DVDs in the mail  to a company so big and powerful, it is maybe going to buy Warner Brothers and own Bugs Bunny and Tony Soprano and the Harry Potter movies. 
But even Netflix may be flirting with some slightly less binge-y models of content release. 
Are we entering  the end of the binge drop? 
On our latest: what data tells us about binge watching. 
Was it the greatest business decision, and who does binge watching really benefit? 
Here's some of the research. 
This episode was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Meg Cramer. 
It was fact-checked by Dania Suleman and engineered by Maggie Luthar. 
Alex Goldmark is our executive producer. 
Music: NPR Source Audio - "Tinker Snow Bell," "In the Heat of the Night," "Elevated," "Rolling Out of Town," and "Blue and Green." 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
13.8%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
42.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Hindsight Bias
30.7%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
7.9%
Optimism Bias
30.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
5.3%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
6.9%
Anecdotal
0%
Appeal to Authority
7.9%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
6.9%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
5.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
30.7%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
30.7%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

189 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.